(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE : _,
(The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
STATEMENT OF CLAIM .












13 and Appendix 11, because the Carrier did not introduce substantial,
credible evidence that proved the Claimant violated the rules enumerated in
their decision.
FINDINGS
Upon the whole record and all the evidence, the Board finds that the parties herein are carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended. Further, the Board is duly constituted by Agreement, has jurisdiction of the Parties and of the subject matter, and the Parties to this dispute were given due notice of the hearing thereon.
Both Claimants were assessed formal reprimands that are to be retained in their work records Claimant Nalwood is a Lead Welder with 28 years of service with the Carrier with a clear record, and Claimant Lopez commenced working in March, 1996, with only one prior record entry to date.
On Friday, January 23, 1998, Claimant Lopez tripped over some equipment and fell. Claimant Nalwood knew about the fall, but Claimant Lopez at that time did not believe he had suffered an injury, contending he only was sore from the fall.
,~'~,3 N~ .~SSo
Page 2 Award No. ln~y
Case No. 69

The Lead Welder, at about 3:30 PM, called his Supervisor at his office, leaving a phone mail message regarding his assistant's fall. At about 6.30 PM Friday evening, Claimant Lopez called the Division Engineer to report the accident, but did not then request medical attention. However, shortly after midnight on Saturday, Claimant Lopez sought medical attention from a hospital emergency room and subsequently from a Company Doctor on Monday.









Claimant Lopez's immediate Supervisor in the field was the Lead Welder, Claimant Nalwood. The Lead Welder did know of the incident and did report same via phone mail to his Supervisor.

Because the assistant did not require medical attention, the Lead Welder did not, at 2:30 PM when his assistant fell, report the incident, but did so near the end of his shift at 3:30 PM. The



Page 3 Award No. 64;
Case No. 69

Lead Welder was not aware that his assistant suffered to the degree he did, and obviously believed he had complied with the Rules.

The Carrier witness, when questioned by the Claimant's representative as to the requirement of the Rules in incidents such as this, stated that;





The only fault of the Lead Weider that is evident is that he did not try to track down his Supervisor via whatever means possible to report what he believed to be a minor incident. The assistant did comply when he reported it to his immediate Supervisor, the Lead Weider, and then when he again reported it to the Division Enginear Friday evening when the soreness really started to bother him.

In reviewing the Rules cited and analyzing each in view with what occurred, the Board finds that neither Claimant was in violation. Both complied with the literal intent of the Rules.





This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(a) be made. The Carrier is ordered to make the Award effective on or before 30 days following the postmark date the Award is transmitted to the parties.


              Robert L. Hicks, Chairman b eutra Member


Rick B. Wehrli, Labor Member Thomas M. Rohling, Carrier Me er
Dated.