(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE
: _,
(The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
.
1. That the Carrier's decision to issue a Level 1 Formal Reprimand for Central
Region, N. Nalwood and J. L. Lopez was unjust.
2. That the Carrier now rescind their decision and expunge all discipline, and
transcripts and pay for all wage loss as a result of Investigation held 9:00
a.m. February 17, 1998 continuing forward and/or otherwise made whole,
because the Carrier did not introduce substantial, credible evidence that
proved that the Claimant violated the rules enumerated in their decision, and
even if the Claimant violated the rules enumerated in the decision,
suspension from service is extreme and harsh discipline undgr the
circumstances.
3. That the Carrier violated the Agreement particularly but not limited to Rule
13 and Appendix 11, because the Carrier did not introduce substantial,
credible evidence that proved the Claimant violated the rules enumerated in
their decision.
FINDINGS
Upon the whole record and all the evidence, the Board finds that the parties herein are
carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended. Further, the Board
is duly constituted by Agreement, has jurisdiction of the Parties and of the subject matter, and the
Parties to this dispute were given due notice of the hearing thereon.
Both Claimants were assessed formal reprimands that are to be retained in their work
records Claimant Nalwood is a Lead Welder with 28 years of service with the Carrier with a clear
record, and Claimant Lopez commenced working in March, 1996, with only one prior record entry
to date.
On Friday, January 23, 1998, Claimant Lopez tripped over some equipment and fell.
Claimant Nalwood knew about the fall, but Claimant Lopez at that time did not believe he had
suffered an injury, contending he only was sore from the fall.
,~'~,3
N~ .~SSo
Page 2 Award No.
ln~y
Case No. 69
The Lead Welder, at about 3:30 PM, called his Supervisor at his office, leaving a phone mail
message regarding his assistant's fall. At about 6.30 PM Friday evening, Claimant Lopez called
the Division Engineer to report the accident, but did not then request medical attention. However,
shortly after midnight on Saturday, Claimant Lopez sought medical attention from a hospital
emergency room and subsequently from a Company Doctor on Monday.
The charge to each Claimant was that each "failed to properly report injury."
The Rules cited as to have been violated read as follows:
"S-28.1.3 Accidents, Injuries, and Defects
Report by first means of communication any accidents; personal injuries; defbcts in
tracks, bridges, or signals; or any unusual condition that may affect the safe and
efficient operation of the railroad. Where required, furnish a written report promptly
after reporting the accident.
5-28,2.5 Reporting
All cases of personal injury, while on duty or on company property, must be
immediately reported to the proper manager' and the prescribed form completed.
A personal injury that occurs while off duty that will in any way affect employee
performance of duties must be reported to the proper manager as soon
as
possible.
The injured employee must also complete the prescribed written form before
returning to service.
S-28.13 Reporting and Complying with Instructions
Employees will report to and comply with instructions from supervisors who have
the proper jurisdiction. Employees will comply with instructions issued by managers
of various departments when the instructions apply to their duties."
Claimant Lopez's immediate Supervisor in the field was the Lead Welder, Claimant
Nalwood. The Lead Welder did know of the incident and did report same via phone mail to his
Supervisor.
Because the assistant did not require medical attention, the Lead Welder did not, at 2:30
PM when his assistant fell, report the incident, but did so near the end of his shift at 3:30 PM. The
Page 3 Award No. 64;
Case No. 69
Lead Welder was not aware that his assistant suffered to the degree he did, and obviously believed
he had complied with the Rules.
The Carrier witness, when questioned by the Claimant's representative as to the
requirement of the Rules in incidents such as this, stated that;
^...A_ There's a Cancer rule, Sir, that says that any time an incident of injury or injury
is reported, they're supposed to report it to the supervisor of the territory before the
The only fault of the Lead Weider that is evident is that he did not try to track down his
Supervisor via whatever means possible to report what he believed to be a minor incident. The
assistant did comply when
he
reported it to
his
immediate Supervisor, the Lead Weider, and then
when he again reported it to the Division Enginear Friday evening when the soreness really started
to bother him.
In reviewing the Rules cited and analyzing each in view with what occurred, the Board finds
that neither Claimant was in violation. Both complied with the literal intent of the Rules.
Claim sustained.
.ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award
favorable to the Claimant(a) be made. The Carrier is ordered to make the Award effective on or
before 30 days following the postmark date the Award is transmitted to the parties.
Robert L. Hicks, Chairman b eutra Member
Rick B. Wehrli, Labor Member Thomas M. Rohling, Carrier Me er
Dated.