(Brotherhood of Maintenance.of Way Employes .
p~R TIES TO DISPUTE: - ._
(The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad

STATEMENT OF CLAI M












and Appendix 11 because. the Carrier did not introduce substantial, credible
evidence that proved the Claimant violated the rules enumerated in their
decision.
FINDINGS
Upon the whole record and all the evidence, the Board finds that the parties herein are carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended. Further, the Board is duly constituted by Agreement, has jurisdiction of the Parties and of the subject matter, arid the Parties to this dispute were given due notice of the hearing thereon.
Claimant, for the second time within ten years, violated Rule 1.5. Employees who do so are dismissed. There is no second chance.
Following his first encounter with Rule 1.5, the employee is given a chance in the hopes he/she will straighten out their act and once again become a good worker.
Claimant was guilty of imbibing in a prohibitive drug for the second time. There is no second chance, and since substantial evidence was adduced on the property, Carrier's decision to dismiss was entirely proper and in accordance with the Rules.
,rea ,u0-S9s

Award No. B~1

Case No. 82


'Page 2

AWARD

Claim denied.

This Board, after consideration of the dispute Identified above, hereby orders that an award

favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.

ZQ9::~td 1
Robert L. Hicks, Chairman & Neutral Member

rli,LaborMember

Thomas M. Roh ing, Carri ember

Dated' 1p/7/ y$