PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 6386
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES )
Case No. 1
and )
Award No. 1
BESSEMER & LAKE ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY )
Martin H. Malin, Chairman & Neutral Member
D. D. Bartholomay, Employee Member
J. F . Ingham, Carrier Member
Hearing Date: March 23, 2001
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1. The dismissal of R. Diehl for alleged violation of Operating Rules B and G, and
General Rule B-4 by testing positive for cocaine in a random drug test on October
17, 2000, was without just and sufficient cause and based on an unproven charge.
Discipline imposed was arbitrary, capricious and excessive.
2. R. Diehl shall be reinstated to service with seniority unimpaired and he shall be
compensated for the wage loss suffered.
FINDINGS:
Public Law Board No. 6386, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds
that Employee and Carrier are employee and carrier within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as amended; and, that the Board has jurisdiction over the dispute herein; and, that the parties
to the dispute were given due notice of the hearing thereon and did participate therein.
On October 25, 2000, Carrier notified Claimant to report for an investigation on
November 2, 2000, concerning his alleged violation of Operating Rules B and G, and General
Rule B-4, for allegedly testing positive for cocaine as a result of a DOT random drug test on
October 17, 2000. The hearing was held as scheduled, and on November 10, 2000, Carrier
advised Claimant that he had been found guilty of the charges and had been dismissed from
service.
The Board has reviewed the record carefully. We find that Carrier proved the charges by
substantial evidence. Claimant's misconduct is extremely serious. However, considering
Claimant's thirty years of service, the absence of any discipline on Claimant's record since
1979, a significant commendation for devising a method to stand erect while using a tie drill
which was written up in the Bessemer Bulletin, his acceptance of responsibility for his conduct,
and additional circumstances, unique to this case, and without intending to set a precedent for
future cases, the Board finds that Claimant should be given one last chance to demonstrate that
he can be a productive drug-free employee. Claimant shall be reinstated to service on a last
chance basis, with seniority unimpaired but without compensation for time held out of service,
and subject to the following conditions:
1. Claimant must contact the Carrier's Employee Assistance Program Administrator
(EAPA) within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this award, and submit to a
complete evaluation of his conditions. Claimant must undertake and successfully
complete the recommended treatment and aftercare program, if any, including
documented attendance of meetings and counseling sessions, as a condition of his
continued employment.
2. Claimant shall authorize the EAPA and whomever else he may be referred to by the
EAPA to release all records and recommendations pertaining to his treatment and
prescribed program of follow-up treatment and/or counseling to the Carrier's Director
Medical Services.
3. Claimant shall have no rights to work until the EAPA and the Carrier's Director
Medical Services have approved him to return to work. Claimant must pass a return to
work physical examination, including drug and alcohol testing.
4. Subsequent to reinstatement, Claimant must furnish the designated Carrier official no
later than the tenth day of each month with documented proof that he is complying with
any aftercare program recommended by the EAPA.
5. Claimant shall be subject to periodic testing for the presence of drugs and/or alcohol in
his system, without prior notice, for three years from his first day worked. The Carrier
shall use this authority in a diligent and reasonable manner, and not to harass the
Claimant.
6. The Claimant is required to remain in full compliance with the Carrier's drug and
alcohol policy. Claimant must understand that his future employment is within his own
control since the Carrier is not required to tolerate any repetition of substance abuse.
-z-
pL'g to
3810
19
wd 1
7. Claimant is required to enroll in Carrier's health insurance program before incurring
treatment and aftercare expenses. Should Claimant fail to successfully complete such
recommended treatment program, and should he fail to return to service within ninety
(90) days of the effective date of this Award, Carrier may cancel said insurance
retroactive to the date of such re-activation, and any and all medical expenses incurred
shall revert to and become the sole responsibility of the Claimant.
Should Claimant not accept the above conditions, his dismissal shall stand undisturbed.
Should the Carrier determine Claimant's failure to comply fully with these conditions, he
shall be removed from service and returned to a dismissed status, without investigation
and without appeal.
AWARD
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
ORDER
The Board, having determined that an award favorable to Claimant be made, hereby
orders the Carrier to make the award effective within thirty (30) days following the date two
members of the Board affix their signatures hereto
Martin H. Malin, Chairman
J. F. Ingham D. ' . artholomay
Carrier Member Empl ee Member
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, March 26, 2001
-3-