Parties to Dispute:







Statement of Claim:





Upon the whole record and ail the evidence, after hearing, the Board finds that the parties herein or-, carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, acrd this board is duly constituted by agreement and has jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter.


This award is based on the facts and circumstances of this particular case and shall not serve as a precedent in any other case.


Chins disposed of as follows:

The record reflects that Claimant submitted far mileage reimbursement for use of his personal automobile on September 5, 6, 7110, 11, 12 and 13, 200 1, when, in fact, he had used a Carrier vehicle. Claimant was not entitled to such reimbursement and Carrier acted reasonably in discrediting Claimant"s assertion that lie believed he had a right to the mileage payment. Accordingly, we find that Carrier proved flag charges by substantial evidence.


Under the circnlaastances, however, we find that the penalty of dismissal is excessive. Claimant had twenrysix years of service, Most sae-,nificantly, Carrier failed to gal! Claimant's foreman as a witness. The foreman

d


could have provided crucial testimony that ,-racy have established aggravating or mitigating circumstances. Consequently, we steal! award that Claimant be reinstated to service with seniority unimpaired but without compensation for time head out of service.

                    M. H. Malin

                    Chairman and Neutral Member


~.~'Y ~~ ~. ,
P, K./Geller, Sr. D, L, Kerby
Organization Member Carrier Member

                Issued at Chicago. Illinois an June 20. 2002