Parties to Dispute:







Statement of Claim:




Upon the whole record and all the evidence, after hearing, the Board finds that the parties herein are carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and this board is duly constituted by agreement and has jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter.


This award is based on the facts and circumstances of this particular case and shall not serve as a precedent in any other case.


Claim disposed of as follows:

There is no question that Carrier proved the charges by substantial evidence. Claimant admitted videotaping while at the controls of moving equipment and posting the videos on YouTube. The critical question is the appropriateness of the penalty of dismissal. It is clear that Claimant's actions were not malicious - rather they . were stupid. Furthermore, when the Chatsworthderailment, an incident involving a different£airier in California where the engineer of a passenger train collided with a freight train while sending a text message, Claimant, on his own initiative, ceased videotaping. It appears that the Chatsworth incident made Claimant realize how unsafe his actions were.




Claimant's misconduct, while very serious, would a to be correctable with discipline short ofdi `sat. We conclude that tire penalty of dismissal was excessive. Carrier shall reins Claimant to service but without compensation for time out of service. Furthermore, Clot shall forfeit his machine operator seniority.

                  r


                  M. Ii. Malin

                  Chairman and Neutral Member


J. d D. L. Kerby
ization Member Carrier Member

              Issued at Chicago, Illinois on September 24, 2009