BEFORE PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 6915
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
and
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILROAD
Case No. 2
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Appeal of the dismissal of Claimant T. Wardas for allegedly testing positive for the
presence of prohibited substances while on duty on September 30, 2005.
FINDINGS:
By letter dated October 17, 2005, the Claimant was directed to attend a formal
investigation and hearing "for the purpose of ascertaining the facts and determining your
responsibility, if any, for allegedly possessing prohibited substances in your bodily fluids
while on duty on September 30, 2005." After a postponement, the investigation was
conducted on November 11, 2005, and the Claimant did not appear for the investigation.
By letter dated November 29, 2005, the Claimant was notified that as a result of the
investigation, he had been found guilty of violating the terms of his May 4, 2002,
Leniency Reinstatement Agreement, as well as Carrier's General Rule G and the
Carrier's Substance and Alcohol Free Environment (SAFE) Policy. This letter further
informed the Claimant that he was being dismissed from the Carrier's service. The
Organization thereafter filed a claim on the Claimant's behalf, challenging the Carrier's
decision to discharge the Claimant. The Carrier denied the claim.
The Carrier initially contends that the Claimant was discharged when he tested
positive for prohibited substances in violation of Carrier rules, policies, and instructions,
1
Pl. 8 10915
A
wd 2
as well as the terms and conditions of the Claimant's Leniency Reinstatement and EAP
agreements. The Carrier maintains that when the Claimant tested positive and failed to
fully comply with those terms and conditions, he voluntarily activated the self-executing
provisions of those agreements, resulting in his automatic discharge. The Carrier insists
that it was the Claimant's own actions and/or inactions that resulted in his discharge for
clear violation of Carrier rules and the waiver/EAP agreements.
Addressing the Organization's assertion that the Claimant was not properly
notified of the investigation, the Carrier asserts that the notice was delivered. Moreover,
the Carrier emphasizes that the Organization representative at the hearing agreed to
proceed in the Claimant's absence.
The Carrier ultimately contends that instant claim should be denied in its entirety.
The Organization initially contends that the Claimant was not properly notified of
the investigation, so he was not present for the hearing. The Organization maintains that
the Carrier failed to provide the Claimant with a fair and impartial hearing.
The Organization ultimately contends that the instant claim should be sustained in
its entirety.
The parties being unable to resolve their dispute, this matter came before this
Board.
This Board has reviewed the procedural arguments raised by the Organization, and
we find them to be without merit.
This Board has reviewed the evidence and testimony in this case, and we find that
there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the finding that the Claimant failed to
2
TL8
b9 /5
live up to the requirements of the Rule G waiver that he had executed in May of 2002. In
that waiver, the Claimant had agreed to submit to random testing. He was tested on
September 30, 2005, and came up positive for alcohol and cocaine.
Once this Board has determined that there is sufficient evidence in the record to
support the guilty finding, we next turn our attention to the type of discipline imposed.
This Board will not set aside a Carrier's imposition of discipline unless we find its
actions to have been unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious.
This is the Claimant's second Rule G violation. The Claimant entered into a selfexecuting agreement in which he agreed that if he came up positive again, he would be
terminated. This Board cannot find that the Carrier's action in terminating the Claimant
was unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious. Therefore, the claim must be denied.
AWARD:
The claim is denied.
ETER R. IEY
eutral er
O IZATION ER C R EMBER
DATED: - ~1,,,-
a
DATED: (`s/26~I~.6
3