BEFORE PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 6915
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES DIVISION
and
CN-WISCONSIN CENTRAL RAILROAD
Case No. 10
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Appeal of the dismissal of Claimant A.S. Thomas for allegedly failing to comply with
Rules B, H, and 1, and for allegedly being absent from work for three (3) consecutive
days.
FINDINGS:
By letter dated February 15, 2006, the Claimant was directed to attend a formal
investigation and hearing "for the purpose of ascertaining the facts and to determine
whether or not you violated company rules, instructions or policies when you allegedly
failed to return to examining physician for final clearance; failed to provide an updated
medical status report as instructed by CN Medical Services and absent without
authority." The investigation was conducted, as scheduled, on March 1, 2006. By letter
dated March 20, 2006, the Claimant was notified that as a result of the investigation, he
had been found guilty of violating the Carrier's Operating Rules and General Rules B, H,
and 1, and that he had forfeited his seniority by being absent from work for three
consecutive workdays. This letter further informed the Claimant that he was being
dismissed from the Carrier's service. The Organization thereafter filed a claim on the
Claimant's behalf, challenging the Carrier's decision to discharge the Claimant. The
Carrier denied the claim.
The Carrier initially contends that the record contains credible testimony and
1
A
Gam,4l4®
evidence proving that the Claimant violated the cited rules. The Carrier asserts that the
record also proves that the Claimant forfeited his seniority, as set forth in Rule 31,
Paragraph J, of the parties' collective bargaining agreement, when he was absent from
._.L -f ,- *h,-oo ., .._t;*>o ,*.VILAay_
YVVt111Vt
t1114W iollsel.UUV4
WV11\UUyJ.
The Carrier argues that in light of the incident at issue, the proven rule violations,
and the Claimant's past discipline record, the discipline at issue was appropriate.
The Carrier ultimately contends that the instant claim should be denied in its
entirety.
The Organization initially contends that all of the telephone contact between the
Carrier and the Claimant were initiated by the Claimant. The Organization argues that
although the Carrier sent a certified letter to the Claimant, it never was received.
Moreover, the Carrier did not bother to telephone the Claimant until January 19, and this
call was in response to the Claimant's own call asking for further direction. The
Organization points out that the Claimant had phoned the Carrier, and that someone
named "Ann" confirmed that the Carrier had received the fax sent from the Claimant's
doctor on January 13`h; "Ann" further told the Claimant that someone would be
rnntanfno him
The Organization maintains that with regard to the alleged violation of Rule B,
T_P__~t_llr,
___U l,_i____1__'._gAl_ TL1!Yll'_Ll .ll _il
iccpmuuy, auu t,,umtuymg
WAR
msuW Lions, uie k.iantlant coialpnCU
Will
am tiistruUtiuiis
that he received to the best of his ability, and he repeatedly exhibited initiative. The
Claimant called for a return-to-work physical, and his repeated attempts at progress and
to reach Holman were ignored.
2
PUB op
of
pasoddns sem au Team maul jueuzlelo aqT
Imp
malo
11
saxeuz pzooaz aqZ
.llomv
pazapzsuoo sum puL.~TTZoluas siq pallapoj JULUTIEID
OTl;
`jInsaz a
sd
-Niom
of
uul4az plnoo aq imp os suoporuisul sil qjtm Alduzoo PUB, aap.Teo app
oz uodaa
of
oaTre1 ~irnaleadaz 1ueTUTVT-)
OUT
-,~1TZOU1ne 1nouUm 1uasov.
TFUTOO .TOT T,TTv,n,p.,q
IeolpaTU pajupdn ue UTBTUTeuT oT Tsanbaz s,.ToTZTpD
OLD
pm fldTuoo
oT
OUTlle3
J0
6jIn12
qUT-u..
,.,T.Tr.,
scixT T~TEi;u`icl~ aid; j.ei,(';
.c~uTTru
aq;
4-TVUUUn
v; pivaa.T aid;
iit
aauaplA0 TuaijUjns st aAaqT
TVTIj
puTJ
am PUB `asea
sTTP III
SuouzTTsaI PUB aauaplAa aTIT pamaIAa.I seq pxeog slqZ
-pseog
slip azojaq auieo iaueuz
slilT
`alndslp
.TT0LIT
OAIOSOT 01 alqeun
BIEN
salwd aqZ
'Sed Noeq
IITT3
qjlm PUB `paareduTiun sUTBlz zaq;o
Ile
PUB
XT?joluas
IITg
qjim palmsuta.T XlalelpauTUn aq plnoqs JueTUlelD aqj PUB `ATazITUa
sTl
ui paupelsns aq plnoqs uzrelo juejsul ail iep spualuoo TSIaieuugln uoTTezlue2zp
011,1,
'Nzom oT UJMaa
01
paIoaJTp sem zaAau
TueuttelD atp asneoaq sSep aAITnaasuoa aazT
z03 N3oM uzo.Tj juasqe Buiaqjo jueuirelD
at;
Sulsnooe .Toj sised ou sl azaqT
TBTp
sT.Tasse Slleuolllppe uocWznre2.Tp aqy quauTTulodde
slip iRim
paTlduToo flleTTTound jueunelD aqT
Tap
sazlseqdula uopeziue2zo aqZ
quauTTuTodde IeolsSqd Naom-oT-uznja.z IEUTftzo all sem paleuftsap meld pule auTTI ~iTUO 01TI
`aouasqV zo Supzodag
`I
aln~ljo uopeloiA paBalle ail of psz-2az qjlm IeTp spualuoo uaT
TTf1T11V7TTT9~iTll nTTT "n'ITATOC t1TllAD (TT TTTQTTTT TllII~7TSnTT T1lTTTTM PTT croM
IT~Tn "TM '4nTTn9Tn
_ :y.,._
_ U
. Ty
.... ~.: _
.. y
y» y»
y-T- » T.y.~l:'-. » o o.i; [~ .a.uo,va
ou passazdxa Uopuezg JVTIT `aaAamoq `sjslsul uoljeztue2zp aclj -zleda.T ~IOTUT s JueuTlel-
aqT Tnoye uoTTuoranuUUoosiu autos uaaq aAeq neat a.TaqT Teq; S02POlMOU310B uotjezlunzo
aqT `TonpuoD PUB uopeuTZojul 2ulqsluznd `g alnd do uolleloIA POEOI112 app zod sy
/ ~I~
®a)
t
:QasvQ
- o~_~
:Qasva
~a~ga~an~ ~a~a~a~ ~a~saU oas~za~ o
.ta nab
~~I~T '2I
2a~
d
i'
'paluap s1 u,IILIa aqZ
aHvmd
-pajuap oq jsnuz uzlejo auT `azojajaus, -snoloudeo ao `Xzejjzqxe `ajqeuoseaum
azam jueuzIelD aqT ~?ulssluzslp u1 suol~ae s,zaureo auT Imp pug louueo preog
sT
qs
-aOudo
s,.zalueD aip of izodaa oq jeqj slsanbaz panulluoo s,aauzeo aqp ijnn ,iIduaoo of palled
jueuzjeIa atp `uolllppe ul -sXep aepnaasuoo aaaqi and Azom uzozd luasqe sm au asneoaq
`I pup `H `g saInW
ipm
Xldutoo
01
paTIPT TueuueT7 acB
IM
zeaTO
ST
p.TOaa.I au
T
*snoloudeo ao `6nzjjqze `alqeuoseasun uaaq aneq of suolloe
clt nTTTT n nn ecnfm nrrTTrirnern
In iMT17CMnTT c In_,nn n nn*on ,no ,~** ***.~ *__~. * o~*
"y: C"~T -·..
_-_.i»_ ., i".
:C ,Y" »··:r:,. » , ..~»o. ..~ .. oV:Oc. ;o,, ;v ~iuai eruvZj o!'Jy
*pasodzui auildtostp do ad~T aig of uolluape .mo uanT Txau am `5ulputd fjjjn5 aqT Tzoddns
01
p.IOaaT 3111 ul aauapIAQ IualOUdns sl a.IOT IMP pauTtzUQIap seu
pd2og
slqj aOUp
-aouasqe panulluoo stq and uolIezuotpne ou peq
®VY
r7
V