BEFORE PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 6915
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
acrd
CN - WISCONSIN CENTRAL RAILROAD
Case No. 20
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Appeal of the dismissal of Claimant T.R. Miller for alleged violation of Carrier rules,
policies, and/or instructions in connection with his alleged failure to inform the
Carrier of the change in his driver status and his operation of a Carrier vehicle
without proper licensing on August 31, 2006.
FINDINGS:
By letter dated September 18, 2006, the Claimant was notified to appear at a
formal hearing and investigation to determine whether he had violated any Carrier rules,
policies, and/or instructions in connection with his alleged failure to inform the Carrier of
a change in his driver's license status, and his alleged operation of a Carrier vehicle
without proper licensing on August 31, 2006. After a postponement, the investigation
was conducted on October 25, 2006. By letter dated November 13, 2006, the Claimant
was notified that as a result of the hearing, he was found guilty of violating Carrier
General Rule H and Life Manual - S.A.F.E. Rule G#3. This letter further informed the
Claimant that as a result of these findings, the Claimant was being dismissed from the
Carrier's service. The Organization thereafter filed a claim on the Claimant's behalf,
challenging the Carrier's decision to discharge the Claimant. The Carrier denied the
claim.
The Carrier contends that the Claimant's own actions and/or inactions resulted in
i
PLB No. 6915
Award 20
his dismissal. The Carrier emphasizes that it declined the request for leniency and
reinstatement in this case, and the Claimant's dismissal should stand. The Carrier
ultimately contends that the instant claim should be denied in its entirety.
The Organization initially contends that the transcript, as well as a letter from the
Claimant about this matter, recognizes that the Claimant's failure to report the change in
his driving status was a mistake, and not a willful intent to violate the Carrier's rules and
regulations.
The Organization emphasizes that the Claimant has a long service record, is
nearing retirement, and wishes to continue in the Carrier's service in whatever capacity
his qualifications will allow.
The Organization ultimately contends that the instant claim should be sustained in
its entirety.
The parties being unable to resolve their dispute, this matter came before this
Board.
This Board has reviewed the evidence and testimony in this case, and we find that
there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the finding that the Claimant was
guilty of failing to inform the Carrier of the change in his driver's license status. The
Claimant failed to notify the Carrier that his driver's license status had changed after he
was convicted of driving while impaired.
Once this Board has determined that there is sufficient evidence in the record to
support the guilty finding, we next turn our attention to the type of discipline imposed.
This Board will not set aside a Carrier's imposition of discipline unless we find its
2
PLB No. 6915
Award 20
actions to have been unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious.
The record reveals that this Claimant has been employed by the Carrier since
October of 1987. Given that lengthy seniority, this Board finds that the Carrier acted
arbitrarily when it terminated the Claimant's employment for this offense. This Board
orders that the Claimant shall be reinstated to service on a last-chance basis, but without
any back pay. The Claimant shall begin and successfully complete a drug and alcohol
program selected by the Carrier. In addition, he shall only be returned to work after
successfully completing that program and he shall be required to participate in the
Carrier's EAP program for a period of five years. If the Claimant has not completed the
alcohol and drug treatment program by the time this award is issued, then the Claimant's
discharge shall remain in full force and effect.
AWARD:
The claim is sustained in part and denied in part. The Claimant shall be reinstated
to service on a last-chance basis, but with no back pay. The Claimant shall have already
begun and successfully completed a drug and alcohol program selected by the Carrier.
The Claimant shall be returned to work after successfully completing that program and he
shall be required to participate in the Carrier's EAP program for a period of five years in
3
PLB No. 6915
Award 20
i
accordance with the above decyion.
PE tR R. MEYE S
utral Me!O
OR AgIZATI N MEMB~ CA~ E BER
DATED:
5 ~,
,~ DATED: V