AWARD NO. 13 CASE NO. 13

PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 7096

PARTIES ) BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
TO )
DISPUTE ) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (FORMER CHICAGO
NORTHWESTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY)

STATEMENT OF CLAIM

Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:




Goodin (System File 3KB6794T/ 138359 CNW).




As a consequence of the violations referred to in Parts (2) and/or (3) above, Claimant J. Goodin shall now be compensated for one hundred five (105) hours at this applicable rate of pay.


OPINION OF BOARD

This is another claim factually similar to the dispute decided in Award 3 (as also incorporated in Award 5) of this Board involving the five year systemwide contract the Carrier entered into with DeAngelo

PL13 7096, Award 13

Wiseman, etc.

Page 2


Brothers, Inc. for vegetation clearing on various portions of the Carrier's right of way. The findings in that award with respect to exclusivity and notice requirements are incorporated into this award.

In denying the claim in Award 3, this Board also found:



This record in this matter is welldeveloped focusing upon the issue concerning special licenses or permits to perform the spraying of chemicals.

The Organization asserts (and demonstrates through employee statements) that Maintenance of Way forces have performed similar type of spraying work performed by DeAngelo Brothers' forces; the spraying in question involved chemicals which the Organization asserts can be purchased over the counter: and there is an assertion by the Organization (albeit, hearsay) that the DeAngelo Brothers' employee performing the work did not possess any special licenses or permits.

On the other hand, the Carrier has demonstrated that its contract


with DeAngelo Brothers requires the contractor to °... obtain all necessary permits and licenses for handling, applying and disposing of chemical herbicides"; Maintenance of Way forces do not have such licenses or permits; an assertion that licenses and permits are required to spray these types of chemicals and herbicides on property not owned by the company performing the spraying work; and the argument that the Carrier is not obligated to piecemeal large projects such as even though there is arguably some portion of the work could be performed by the Carrier's forces.

The Organization counters the Carrier's assertions with respect to licenses and permits arguing that there is nothing in the record to definitively show that such licenses and permits are required.

While the record is welldeveloped, the conflicting facts and assertions brought forward by the parties make the point. There is just too much conflict in the record for this Board to make the necessary definitive findings. But the burden is on the Organization. Therefore, for the same reasons expressed in Award 3, the conflicting nature of the record requires that this claim be denied.

PLB 7096, Award 13

Wiseman, etc.

Page 3


AWARD




Edwin H. Berm

Neutral Member









Chicago, Illinois

Dated: