The Board, upon the whole record and on the evidence, finds that the parties herein are Carrier and Employees within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended; that this Board is duly constituted by agreement of the parties; that the Board has jurisdiction over the dispute, and that the parties were given due notice of the hearing.
Claimant and a co-worker both failed to report for work on October 1 1, 2007. Their foreman, who normally prepares the payroll information for the gang, was also absent that day due to a death in his family. Upon his return, the foreman mistakenly showed both employees to have been present and working on October I I ". Neither employee properly carried out their individual responsibility to check the payroll information for accuracy. Consequently, they were both technically guilty of allowing an inaccurate payroll record to be submitted. A Carrier official caught the error and neither Public I.aw Board No. 7104 Award No. 42
Careful review of the record reveals substantial evidence confirming claimant's responsibility for his absence as well as the submission of the inaccurate payroll information. However, the record also portrays unique mitigating circumstances that call for modification of the Carrier's disciplinary penalty. Given these factors and the unfavorable aspects of claimant's prior work record, he should be offered reinstatement to his former employment status, with seniority and other attributes of that status unimpaired, but without any back pay or other economic benefits associated with the period of time he has been out of service.
The Carrier is further directed to comply with this Award within thirty (30) days of the date shown below.