PARTIES ) BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION,
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
TO )
DISPUTE ) CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.









J. Mobley shall now each be compensated at their respective and applicable rates of
pay for an equal share of the fifty (50) straight time hours and the twenty-four and
one-half (24.5) overtime hours that B&B Mechanic T. Marion expended in the
performance of the aforesaid work on August 15, 16, 17, 18, 24 and 25, 2010.
FINDINGS:

The Board, upon consideration of the entire record and all of the evidence, finds that the parties are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, that this Board is duly constituted by Agreement dated March 20, 2008,`this Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein, and that the parties were given due notice of the hearing held.

During August 2010, the Carrier used a B&B Mechanic, T. Marion, to perform welding on culvert pipes in the vicinity of Wofford, Kentucky. The Organization filed the instant claim asserting that the work performed was structural welding work that may be performed only by certified


B&B Structural Welder Roster. The Organization cites Section 1 I.A. of the Memorandum of

Agreement effective September I, 2009, reading as follows:


















The threshold question in this case is whether the work is considered structural work and must therefore be performed by a certified welder. While the Carrier, in its argument before the Board, denied that the work in question was structural work, we find that this argument was not raised during the handling of the claim on the property. Inasmuch as the Organization's position that it was structural work was not refuted, we will find, at least for the purposes of this claim and without establishing a precedent, that the work performed was structural work. As to whether one must be a certified structural welder to perform it, we find that Section 1 I establishes a special seniority roster for employees who have such a certification. The concept of having seniority rosters is tied to the reservation of certain work to those employees holding seniority. It follows, therefore, that none but employees on the Structural Welder seniority roster may perform structural welder

The Carrier has asserted that Claimants also did not have seniority rights to perform this work. The record before the Board is insufficient to allow us to make such a determination. Under the circumstances, we will sustain the claim conditional upon Claimants, either both or individually, having been on the seniority roster as Structural Welders on the dates of claim. If either of them was not, the claim is denied with respect to that Claimant.





                  C irman and Na~.itral Member


      G~.


Peter E. Kennedy Robert Paszta
Employee Member Carrier Member

Dated:
Arlington Heig s, Illinois