AWARD NO. 182
Case No. 182
Organization File No. 156711912 Carrier File No. 2012-133420
PARTIES TO DISPUTE
) BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION,
) INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
)
)
) CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
2. As a consequence of the violation referred to in Part 1 above, Claimant R. Soyk shall be paid all hours (straight time and overtime) worked by Track Inspector Bray while filling the flagging position during the time period listed above.
FINDINGS:
The Board, upon consideration of the entire record and all of the evidence, finds that the parties are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, that this Board is duly constituted by Agreement dated March 20, 2008, this Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein, and that the parties were given due notice of the hearing held.
The Organization asserts the Carrier violated the Agreement by assigning Track Inspector
G. Bray to fill an assistant foreman temporary vacancy between October 1 and October 13, 2012, although Claimant had greater seniority as an assistant foreman. The instant claim was filed by the Organization by letter dated October 17, 2012. The Organization notified the Carrier by letter dated
PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 7163
AWARD NO. 182
PAGE2
February 5, 2013 that the claim had not yet been answered. It asks that the claim now be allowed as presented in accordance with Rule 24(a) of the Agreement. That provision states:
A claim or grievance must be presented, in writing, by an employee or on his behalf by his union representative to the Designated Officer, or other designated official within sixty (60) days from the date of the occurrence on which the claim is based. The Designated Officer, or other designated official shall render a decision within sixty (60) days from the date same is file, in writing, to whoever filed the claim or grievance (the employee or his union representative). When not so notified, the claim will be allowed.
Based upon the record before us, we find that the Carrier, during the handling of the claim on the property, had offered no defense to the Organization's allegation that no decision on the claim was rendered within the time limit. While the Carrier addressed this issue before the Board, we may not consider it as it was a new argument. We must, therefore, sustain the claim as presented, without regard to the merits.
AWARD: Claim sustained. The Carrier is directed to comply with this Award within forty-five days.
c
Andrew Mulford
Employee Member
Rob Miller
Carrier Member