161

1 4

Award No. 291

PLB No. 7163

FINDINGS:

This is another claim (see our Award #290) where the Organization argues that the Carrier violated Rule 24(b) ofthe Contro11ing Agreement. The Organization contends that the Carrier's highest designated officer failed to notify in writing, whoever listed the claim or grievance ( employee or his Union Representative) within sixty (60) days after the date the claim or grievance was discussed ofthe reason therefore. When not so notified, the claim will be ailowed.

The Carrier responds that there was no violation of Rule 24(b). The Carrier's Division Engineer stated that another employee, John Nurrerbem which according to the Carrier did not work any overtime on November 23, 2013 through January 10, 2014. The information was documented by his payroll record. Further, the claim was denied by the highest designated officer on December 19, 2014. The Organization has not shown the Carrier has violated any rule or agreement. The Organization has not met their burden of proof that the Carrier vioiated any rule or agreement.

Page 2 of 4

3 of4

Katrina Donovan Andrew M. Mulford

July 13, 2018