AWARD NO. 373

Case No. 373


Organization File No. D91402218 Carrier File No. 18-35645


PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 7163


PARTIES TO DISPUTE

) BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION,

) INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS

)

)

) CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: ''Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:


  1. The Carrier's discipline (dismissal) of Mr. R. Gudausky, by letter dated January 11, 2018, in connection withallegations that he violated CSX Transportation Rules 104.2, 2007.3 (3) and 2007.6 was arbitrary, unsupported and on the basis of unproven charges (System File D91402218/18-35645 CSX).


  2. Asa consequence ofthe violation referred to in Part 1 above,'...thedismissal shall be set aside and the Claimant shall me made whole for all financial and benefit losses as a result of the violation. Any benefits lost, including vacation and health insurance benefits (including coverage under the railroad industry National Plan), shall be restored. Restitution for financial losses as a result of the violation shall include compensation for:


    1. Straight time for each regular work day lost and holiday pay for each holiday lost, to be paid in the rate of the position assigned to Mr. Gudausky at the time of removal from service (this amount is not reduced by earnings from alternate employment obtained by Mr. Gudausky while wrongfully dismissed);

    2. Any general lump sum payment or retroactive general wage increase provided in any applicable agreement that became effective while Mr. Gudausky was out of service;

    3. Overtime pay for lost overtime opportunities based on overtime for any position hecould haveheld during the time Mr. Gudausky was dismissed from service, or on overtime paid to any junior employee for work Mr. Gudausky could have performed had he not been removed from service;

      PUBLIC LAW BOARD No. 7163

      AWARD NO. 373

      PAGE2


    4. Health, dental and vision care insurance premiums, deductibles and co-pays that he would not have paid had he not been unjustly dismissed.


All notations of this dismissal should be removed from all carrier records.' (Employes' Exhibit A-4')."


FINDINGS:


The Board, upon consideration of the entire record and all of the evidence, finds that the parties are Carrierand Employee within the meaningof the Railway Labor Act, asamended, that this Board is duly constituted by Agreement dated March 20, 2008, this Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein, and that the parties were given due notice of the hearing held.

Following a formal investigation at which he was charged with making a backing movement in a CSX vehicle and making contact with an outside party's vehicle, resulting in damage to CSXT equipment, as well as being dishonest and concealing facts about the incident when questioned by a supervisor, Claimant was dismissed from service.

This investigation came about because someone called the 1-800 number on the Company vehicle to report that the vehicle backed into her unoccupied vehicle near Mather and Sayer Avenues in Chicago Ridge, Illinois. According to the caller, the driver got out of the vehicle, looked at the damage, and then left the scene. At the investigation, photographs showing damage to a Toyota hybrid vehicle and scratches to the bumper of Claimant's vehicle were introduced. Additionally, a video showing this incident was made a part of the record. In his defense, Claimant acknowledged backing up toward the Toyota, and getting out of his vehicle to see if he had hit the car. According to Claimant, hesaw nodamage. Assistant Division Engineer T. H. Jensen testified that he had asked Claimant about the incident, and was told that he did not think he hit the car.

image


07/15/19