PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO.
7'585
Case No. 9/Award No. 9
Carrier File No.: 11-12-00101
Organization File No.: S-P-1614-0
Claimant: M. Holland
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
)
(former Burlington Northern Railroad Company)
)
)
-and- )
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE
)
OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION - IBT
}
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FACTS:
On Aug. 3, 2011, James Jacobson was Employe In Charge with track authority which
included switch 1425 East at milepost 90.3 on the Yakima Valley Sub. Claimant Michael
Holland was working under his warrant when he threw a switch to unload a truck and
forgot to return it to the normal position. He did not indicate this in the paperwork he
filed. The next day Conductor Aaron Thompson ran his train over it, stopped and dosed
the switch and called Jacobson to let him know the switch had been left open. Jacobson
did not report the incident and things remained quiet until 1600-0700 on Aug.8 when
Manager of Maintenance Planning Paul J. Farley, Sr. received an email from General
Director Line Maintenance Michael Theret regarding an anonymous phone call reporting
the incident. At that point, Farley began asking questions and interviewed Holland
without offering Union representation. Holland admitted to Farley that he had operated
the main line switch without returning it to the normal position. Claimant Holland was
dismissed. At the time of his dismissal, he was a 16-year employee with no discipline of
record.
CARRIER POSITION:
The investigation fell within the 15-day contractual limit of Farley being on notice of a
potential infraction. None of the alleged procedural flaws in the case resulted in any
prejudice to Holland's case. Holland's error was of such potentially devastating and
deadly consequences that dismissal was warranted. In January of 2005, an open main
track switch in South Carolina led to nine deaths, the release of 60 tons of poisonous
gas, 250 people being treated for chlorine exposure and the evacuation of 5,400
residents. In the Carrier's view, the seriousness of the matter cannot be overstated.
PLB ND. 7585
AWARD 9
ORGANIZATION POSITION:
The statement of the Conductor is clearly dated Aug, 4, 2011, meaning management
was on notice of the open switch since that date. As a result the investigation was
untimely and under Rule 40.J of the collective bargaining agreement "the charges
against the employe shall be considered as having been dismissed."
The Organization further maintains a fair and impartial investigation has been
since management undertook to investigate the case prior to the scheduled
investigatory hearing, and interviewed the employee without offering representation.
Claimant Holland has been entirely honest and forthright at every turn, and has a
discipline-free record of no less than 16 years. In its view, none of these important
factors has received adequate consideration. The discipline is grossly excessive.
DECISION:
Conductor Thompson's statement is dated Aug. 4, 2011. However, there is no evidence
that management had it in hand until Aug. 8 when Farley met with the conductor and
interviewed him. He testified that this was when he received the statement. When
Farley spoke with Angelas on August 8, Angelus had already spoken with the train
crew, indicating he was already aware of the switch issue. Nothing mare is in the
record; so Angelus could have spoken with the train crew on Aug. 7. Theret's email was
extremely early on the morning of Aug. 8, leading to the likelihood that whatever
communication Theret received was received the day before. There is nothing in the
record to indicate that an official of BNSF was an notice of the open switch until Aug. 7.
This would give management until Aug. 22 to conduct the investigatory hearing.
!t is troubling that there is information missing from the record. It is quite possible that
management knew about the situation prior to Aug. 7. Clearly there was a path of
information going to and through Theret that is not recorded in terms of time. We don't
know when Angelas spoke to the train crew. Conductor Thompson was not asked when
he wrote his statement or who he gave it to. Since there is no clear record of exactly
when an official of BNSF was on notice of the violation, there is no proof that
management knew of the violation before Aug. 7. Hence, the Arbitrator lacks an
adequate factual basis on which to find a timeliness problem.
It is clear from the record that management interviewed Holland prior to the
investigatory hearing without offering representation. However, there is no indication
that Holland was prejudiced by this. He was honest during the interview and again
during the hearing. A representative would hardly counsel him to do otherwise. The
facts surfaced prior to the hearing did not change.
The Organization protests that Claimant Holland cannot be disciplined for violation of
MOWOR 1.6 because it was not cited during the hearing. The Carrier notes that
General Manager Robert Johnson stated in his November 15, 2011 letter that Rule 1.6
prohibiting carelessness and negligence was breached. This argument misses the
PLB NO. "75$5
AWARD 9
point. Holland has acknowledged violating MOWOR 8.2 and 8.3 regarding handling
switches. By not following the rules, he has by definition been careless and negligent,
but his actions are neither aggravated nor altered in any way by citing Rule 1.6.
The crux of the matter is the tension between the stellar honesty and discipline-free
record of this employee and the serious risk posed by having a switch left open.
Claimant Holland admits leaving the switch open and failing to report on his paperwork
that the switch was left open. The Organization did not and could not argue that an
open switch was minor in nature. It did point out that no actual harm occurred.
The problem management has is that it cannot accept risks of this nature. The Carrier
was not unreasonable in its determination that open switches constitute an extreme
safety hazard. As valuable an employee as Claimant Holland clearly is, the Carrier was
within its rights to view his offense as extremely serious in nature.
AWARD:
The claim is denied.
March 18; Cleveland, Ohio
t
Patricia T. Bittel, Neutral Member
Gary Hart, Labor Member
D. J. Merrell, Carrier Member
3