PARTIES TO

PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 7599


AWARDN0.16 CASEN0.16

THE DISPUTE: Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division

IBT Rail Conference

vs.

Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company


ARBITRATOR: DECISION:

Gerald E. Wallin Claim sustained

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:

"Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:


l. The claim, as appealed under letter dated August 29, 2013, shall be allowed as presented because the Carrier defaulted on the claim when it failed to bold a timely appeal meeting as required by Rule 24(b) (Carrier's File GTW-BMWED-2013-00011 GTW)."


FINDINGS OF THE BOARD:

The Board, upon the whole record and on the evidence, finds that the parties herein are Carrier and Employees within the meaning ofthe Railway Labor Act, as amended; that this Board is duly constituted by agreement ofthe parties; that the Board has jurisdiction over the dispute, and that the parties were given due notice of the hearing.

The claim involved in this matter arose after the Carrier used the employee ofan outside contractor to fill a Spiker Machine Operator position and did not allow a member of the Maintenance of Way craft to exercise seniority into the position.

As noted in the Statement of Claim, the Organization and claimant contend they are entitled to a sustaining decision by virtue ofthe Carrier's default. The Carrier's initial denial of the claim was made by letter dated August 6, 2013. The Organization appealed by letter dated August 29, 2013. The Carrier issued another denial by letter dated October 28, 2013. The record does not establish that a grievance appeal meeting was conducted before the Carrier issued that denial By letter dated December 23, 2013, the Organization claimed the default entitlement as a result of no grievance appeal meeting. That ended the on-property record. The Carrier neither refuted nor responded to the Organization's default claim. The record does not establish that a meeting was ever held.


Page2


Agreement rule 24 go'Vems the procedure to be followed during the handling of the claim on the property. It reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

RULE 24 - CLAIMS A.N..D.GRIEVANCES

(b) A claim orgrievance denied in accordance with paragraph (a) shall beconsidered closed unless it is appealed in writingto the designatedofficer of the company by the employee or his union representativewithin sixty (60) days from receipt ofnotice of disallowance. A claim or grievance appeal meeting with the employee, duly accredited representative, and or localcommittee will be held within sixty (60) days of the carrier's receipt of such notice of appeal. When a claim or grievance is not

allowed, Labor Relations will so notify. in writing, whoever listed the claim or grievance (employee or hisunion representative) within sixty (60)days after liredate the claim or grievance was discussed, of the reason therefor. When not so notified, theclaim will beallowed. Claims paid bydefault are not to beconsidered.a precedent or waiver of the contentions of the employees and will not be referred to in other similar claims.


(Italics supplied)


As written, an appeal meeting must be conducted. Per the mandatory wording of the rule, the parties have provided that an appeal meeting is a condition precedent to the issuance of a denial of the claim; the meeting must be held before the denial is issued. This mandatory requirement for a grievance appeal meeting is entirely consistent with the provisions of the Railway Labor Act (RLA)1RLA §§ 152 First and Sixth impose a duty upon carriers and organizations to exert every reasonable effort to settle all disputes by requiring the parties to engage in a conference as part of their handling of a claim on the property. RLA § 153 First (i} requires that claims be" ... handled in the usual manner ..." on the property as a prerequisite to jurisdiction being conferred upon an adjustment board to consider its merits.


Given the circumstances of this record, the finding is that the instant claim must be sustained by default with the proviso, per the final sentence of Rule 24(b), that it does not set a precedent and may not be referred to in other similar matters.


image

1 45 USC§§ 151-188



AWARD:


The Claim is sustained.

Page3



image

image

Organization Member


Date:

erald E. Wallin, Chairman

image

image

and Neutral Member