 
 CASL NC . 28
CASL NC . 28
 
Broterhood of laintenance of ,Jay Employees
and
Chicago and North Western Transportation Company
 
"Chin of the System Committee of the Brotherhood 
that:
'· (1) The Carrier violated the Agreemeat when it failed ,and refused to
compensate the employes assigned to the track gang headquartered
at IeKalb,, Illinois for work performed in going to and from their
work location and 
assembling point prior to 
and continuoil^ with
their regular assigned work period (Carrier's File 81-1-245) .
 
" (2) Foreman W. L. Krause and 
gang 
members J. Saenzg F. Carreno anti
  
Z. Perez each be allowed fourteen and one-half 
(l4 
1/2) hours' .
  
pay at their respective 
time 
and 
one-half rate because of the
  
violation referred to within Part (1) of this claim."
O 
PINION OF M ARD:
put 
for 
the identity of the Claimants, and 
different 1 (.rations 
and 
dates, the
same c:uestion of contract 
interpretation and application is presented in the instant
case 
as 
in Award 116. 18 (Case No. 10). In both cases we are called upon to reconcile an apparent conflict between males 25, 30 and 
34 
on the one hand and Rule 
43 
Dn
the other.
For reasons developed 
fully 
in Award No. 18 we are persuaded that the resolution
of these conflictinrules requires 
evidence of the 
past practice between the parties.
See Paso Third Division Awards 
4,5813 6&68, 8825, 9263, 9983 
end 13359. Unfortunately,
hofreuer, 
the record contains only belated, bare and contradictory assertions by the
parties regarding practice. 
7his 
is insufficient to permit us to make an informed
 
 dank; ors that point. In the 
circumstances a have no alte.tive but to dismiss
dank; ors that point. In the 
circumstances a have no alte.tive but to dismiss
 
Pablic Law Board 1io. 18U, upon the 
whole record and, all of the 
evidence, 
finds
and holds a: follows.,
 
1. That the Carrier and Eloye involved in this dispute are, respectively,
 
Carrier and pjoye within the me of the Railway Labor 
Act;
2. 
that the Board has 
jurisdiction over the disppute involved herein; and
3. that the Claim :nest be dismissed for lack of proof.
 
Claim dismissed.
 
~:. C. Harper;- 1,1np1oy' lien, 
ber
 
 
Schm3.ege' Carrier nber