SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO. 1016
AWARD NO. 147
CASE NO. 147
PARTIES TO
THE DISPUTE: Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
VS.
Consolidated Rail Corporation
ARBITRATOR: Gerald E. Wallin
DECISION: Claim denied
DATE: June 26, 2001
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
1. The Agreement was violated when the Carrier assigned outside forces (Atlas)
to perform Maintenance of Way work (dismantling and burning a box car
used as a storage facility) in the Pitcairn Yard, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on
April 28, 29 and 30, 1996 (System Docket MW-4436).
2. The Agreement was further violated when the Carrier failed to give the
General Chairman prior written notification of its plan to assign said work to
outside forces.
3. As a consequence of the violations referred to in Parts (1) and/or (2) above,
Structural Welders R. Bowser, T. Grecko, B. M. Putze, J. E. Thomson, S.
Aftanas and T. R. McGuire shall each be allowed "... ten (10) hours straight
time all overtime, to be credited with day and month, to be made whole.***"
FINDINGS OF THE BOARD:
The Board, upon the whole record and on the evidence, finds that the parties herein are
Carrier and Employees within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended; that this Board
is duly constituted by agreement of the parties; that the Board has jurisdiction over the dispute, and
that the parties were given due notice of the hearing.
The record herein demonstrates that Carrier hired a contractor to dismantle and burn the
residue of a boxcar that had been used for storage at its Pitcairn Yard.
As the February 6, 1997 letter of Carrier's Senior Director - Labor Relations states, notice
was served as part of the larger Pitcairn Yard construction project. The removal of the boxcar was
incidental to that project.
Special Board of Adjustment No. 1016 Award No. 147
Page 2
Careful review of the instant record supports the contention that "car dismantling" has also
been performed by other crafts. The requisite exclusivity of performance by the Organization has
not, therefore, been demonstrated. We note that the other crafts were provided notice of the
opportunity to intervene as third parties but declined to do so.
The Claim is denied.
e
-44 r
rald E. Wallin, Chairman
and Neutral Member
R. C. binson, D. L. KerW,
0iz ;o
rg tion Member Carrier Member