SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 1016
Award No. 178
Case No. 178
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
and
Consolidated Rail Corporation
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
1. The Agreement was violated when the Carrier assigned
West Regional Production Gang employe S. Stacy to perform
work on the East Regional Gang Seniority District on
December il, 12 and 13, 1995 instead of calling and
assigning senior furloughed employe L. R. Brubaker to
perform said work (System Docket MW-4223).
2. As a consequence of the violation referred to in
Part (1) above, Mr. L. R. Brubaker shall ". . . be
allowed all wages earned by the junior Stacy during the
claimed period while working in the East Region.
FINDINGS:
This Board, upon the whole record and all of the evidence, finds
and holds as follows:
1. That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this
dispute are, respectively, Carrier and Employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended,; and
2. That the Board has jurisdiction over this dispute.
OPINION OF THE BOARD:
The record indicates that the Carrier assigned an employee from a
different seniority district to perform the disputed work.
Rule 3 (Selection of Positions) provides, in pertinent part,
that:
Section 4. Filling temporary vacancies.
(a) A position or vacancy may be filled
temporarily pending assignment. When new positions or
vacancies occur, the senior qualified available
1
SSA 1016-
Awd X18
employees will given preference, whether working in a
lower rated position or in the same grade or class
pending advertisement and award.
When furloughed employees are to be used to fill
positions under this Section, the senior qualified
furloughed employees in the seniority district shall be
offered the opportunity to return to service. Such
employees who return and are not awarded a position or
assigned to another vacancy shall return to furlough
status.
(e) The word "senior" as used in paragraph (a) of
this Section means, first, senior in the class in which
the assignment is to be made and, thereafter, in the
lower classes respectively, in the same group in the
order in which the classes appear on the seniority
roster.
Rule 4 (Seniority) provides, in pertinent part, that:
Section 3. Return to service.
An employee not in service will be subject to
return to work from furlough in seniority order in any
class in which he holds seniority in his working zone
(either Divisional, Zone or Regional).
Rule 17 (Preference for Overtime Work) provides, in pertinent
part, that:
Employees will, if qualified and available, be
given preference for overtime work, including calls on
work ordinarily and customarily performed by them
during the course of their work week or day in the
order of their seniority.
The disputed work involved snow duty and at least initially
involved an emergency situation. This particular emergency
therefore provided a sufficient basis for the Carrier to assign
the disputed work to an employee from a different seniority
district rather than to the Claimant, who was on furlough at the
time.
The Carrier, however, failed to initiate any attempt to contact
the Claimant after the Carrier had concluded that the disputed
work would extend for two additional days. By failing to attempt
to contact the furloughed Claimant to perform snow duty on the
two following days (December 12 and December 13, 1995), the
Carrier failed to comply with the referenced contractual
provisions.
With respect to an appropriate remedy, the Carrier shall
2
S8A 10116-
Awd 178
compensate the claimant for ten (10) straight time hours and two
(2) overtime hours on December 12, 1995 and for ten (10) straight
time hours and two and one-half (2=) overtime hours on December
13, 1995.
AWARD:
The Claim is partially sustained in accordance with the opinion
of the Board. The Carrier shall make the Award effective on or
before 30 days following the date of this Award.
Robert L. Douglas
Chairman and Neutral Member
1 -
Z
R. . Robinson D. L. Kerbf
Em oyee Member Carrier Member
Dated:
3