BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF
Parties WAY EMPLOYEES
t0 the : Case No. 21
Dispute and











            claimant in this case was a furloughed B&B


    Mechanic on the Youngstown Division seniority list. He was


-' under the jurisdiction of the Division Engineer in that
poet- -~2t

division. He filed a claim with the Shop Superintendent of the
Canton shops,, in a different seniority district because he
alleged that Repairmen were performing work in the canton
shops that belonged to B&B Mechanics.
Carrier contends that the instant claim was improperly filed,since it should have been filed with the Division Engineer, voungstown Division,not with the Superintendent of the Canton Shops.
The organization argues that the claim should be filed at the location where the alleged infraction took place,not necessarily where the Claimant is employed.
This Board has reviewed the record and the arguments presented by both sides. we are of the opinion that the claim was filed with the wrong Supervisor and, consequently, it is not a valid claim and must be dismissed.

AWARD

The claim is dismissed.


              1

              R. Dennis, Neutral Member


S. Powers, Employe Member J. Burt n, Carrier membW

Da of Apprpr v8 a1