PROCEEDINGS BEFORE SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO. 1016
Carrier Member: J. H. Burton Labor Member: S. V. Powers
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it failed and refused
to allow B&B Mechanic R. Pardo to displace junior B&B Mechanic D.
Uram in the Diesel Shop at Oak Island, Newark, New Jersey, effective January 5, 1987 (System Docket CR-3052).
(2) As a consequence of the aforesaid violation, B&B Mechanic R.
Pardo shall be allowed:
"...payment of eight hours each day Mr. Uram works, at
the B&B Mechanic rate plus all the overtime Mr. Uram earns on
this job, while Mr. Pardo is not allowed to displace it.
This will be confirmed through a mutual inspection of Mr.
Uram's pay records between a rep. of Conrail and a rep. of
the Penn Federation."
FINDINGS:
Upon the whole record and all the evidence, and after
hearing on August 17, 1989, in the Carrier's office, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, the Board finds that the parties herein are carrier
and Employees within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
amended, and that this Board is duly constituted by agreement and
has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter.
OPINION
FRM BUVCKWED.
This is a disqualification dispute in which the Claimant,
ATTORNEY AT cW
19129 ROMAN 11NY
GNREWUHG,
IAAHYIAND 2(1079
f3ot) 977-SU
SBA No. 1016 / Award No. 45 - Case No. 45
B&B Mechanic R. Pardo, was denied his attempt to displace a junior
B&B Mechanic from a position at the Carrier's Diesel Terminal at
Oak Island, Newark, New Jersey, on the grounds that he lacked
qualification to perform the assigned duty of the position of operating and maintaining pollution abatement equipment.
The Carrier submits that its actions regarding the Claimant are not improper, because except for the duty of maintaining
the Pollution Abatement Facility, all duties of the position advertised by the bulletin had always been assigned to the position:
that special training was given to the present incumbent of the
position because he lacked abatement pollution equipment qualifications when he bid in the position: and that the Claimant has
made no evidentiary showing that he is qualified for the position.
After due study of the record as a whole,
including the
arguments presented by the parties' submissions in support of
their positions in the case, it is concluded that the claim is not
shown to be meritorious and that it must be denied for lack of the
requisite evidentiary support.
The record does not establish the Claimant's qualifications to perform the duties of operating and
maintaining the
pollution abatement equipment, which is part of the regularly assigned duties of the position in dispute, and consequently, there is
no basis on which this Board could direct the Carrier to place the
FRED
ATMREY AT LAW
Claimant in the position. The Board observes that in a practical
19179 ROMAR YAY
2
GNTHEr1Ha
MARYLMIO 20819
Isa119nso99
SBA No. 1016 / Award No. 45 - Case No. 45
sense, the Organization's argument that the fact that the present
incumbent received training to operate the pollution equipment
gives him a form of super seniority, seems plausible and logical:
however, the fact that such super seniority may result from circumstances such as those involved in this case is not addressed by
the rule, and it is beyond the province of this Board to rewrite
the rule to provide a new procedure which the parties themselves
can provide if they chose to do so.
In view of the foregoing, and based on the record as a
whole, the claim will be denied for lack of the requisite evidentiary support.
,?1 WARD:
Claim denied.
BY ORDER OF SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO. 1016
Fred Blackwell, Neutral Member
r JIB
Wp
S. V. Powers, Labor Member H. Burton, Carrier Member
Executed on
'EE 2 8 1990
,1990
FRED BLACKWELL
Conrail\1016\45-45.N09
ATf01RNEY AT LAW
19129 ROMAN WAY
GXtH81;9
MARYLAND 20&79
13MI 9ns0ao