PROCEEDINGS BEFORE SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO. 1016

AWARD NO. 65

Case No. 65

Referee Fred Blackwell























FRED BLACKWELL ATTORNEY AT LAW

P.O. BOX 8095

WEST COLUMBIA,

S.C.29171

(8031791-8088

                        SBA No. 1016 / Award No. 65 - Case No. 65


                                  OPINION


          On May 22, 1985, Claimant R. E. Burdette filed a claim alleging that he was senior to Mr. V. L. Stockum in Vehicle Operator seniority and that the Carrier had improperly honored Mr. Stockum's protest of the 1984 Pittsburgh District Seniority Roster by


          i

            assigning him a Vehicle Operator seniority date of September 1, 1979 on the Pittsburgh


            District Seniority Roster. The end result of this improper action by the Carrier was that Mr.


            Stockum was improperly placed ahead of Claimant on the Pittsburgh District Seniority f


                                                                Roster. i

          The Organization supports the position of Claimant Burdette on the ground that the Carrier's approval of Mr. Stockum's roster protest violated Rule 4, Section 6 (c) of the Agreement.

          The Carrier supports the seniority date of Mr. Stockum on the ground that his protest of the 1984 roster was valid and that the Carrier properly allowed the remedy requested in the protest.'

            The Agreement provision relied upon by the Organization, Rule 4, Section 6 (c), reads as follows:


                                                                "Section 6. Seniority rosters. i


                  (c) No change on seniority rosters will be made by the Company without


                                                                conference and agreement with the involved union representative."


                                                                i


                                                                I


FRED BLACKWELL ' The Carrier argues additional procedural points which have been considered and
ATTORNEY AT LAW rejected for lack of record support.

P.O. BOX 8095

WESTCOLUMBIA

S.C.29171

(8031791·8088

              SBA No. 1016 / Award No. 65 - Case No. 65


The record shows beyond question that the Carrier acted unilaterally when it ruled favorably on Mr. Stockum's protest and changed the 1985 Pittsburgh Seniority District Roster to show Mr. Stockum with a Vehicle Operator seniority date of September 1, 1979. The Carrier's action regarding Mr. Stockum's roster protest thus violated Rule 4, Section 6 (c), of the Agreement and a sustaining award is in order.

The Board notes that Mr. Stockum has a right to file a protest of the next annual roster, in accord with the parties' Agreement, in regard to any change in his seniority resulting from this Award. In addition, the parties are directed to send notice of said right to Mr. Stockum by certified mail.

In view of the foregoing, and based on the record as a whole, the claim is sustained.


AWARD :

          Claim sustained as per the Opinion. The Carrier violated Rule 4, Section 6 (c),


i
      of the Agreement and therefore, the Organization's objection to the Carrier's


I favorable action on Mr. Stockum's roster protest is found to be valid.

        The Carrier shall comply with this Award on or before December 10, 1992.


                                                        I

          BY ORDER OF SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO. 1016.


FRED BLACKWELL ATTORNEY AT LAW

P.O. BOX 8095

WEST COLUMBIA,

S.C. 29171

(803/791-8086

FRED BLACKWELL
ATTORNEY AT LAW

P.0. BOX 6095

WEST COLUMBIA,

S.C.29171

(8031791-6096


SBA No. 1016 / Award No. 65 - Case No. 65

Fred Blackwell, Neutral Member

S. V. Powers, Labor Member

Executed on

Conrail\ 1016\65-65.N09

1992

. H. Burton, Carrier Member