BEFORE SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO. 1037 . .- ,.___, _.
Case No. 2
hUl7
13 j
1:; ~rJ
PARTIES: Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
TO
DISPUTE: CSX Transportation, Inc.
STATEMENT OF
CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
that:
Dismissal of A.B. Warner, ID # 163595 as a result of
investigation held June 21, 1989 at Florence, South
Carolina."
FINDINGS:
On June 21, 1989, Claimant was charged with habitual absenteeism
from work in violation of Rule 17(B) of the Agreement between Seaboard
System Railroad and its Maintenance of Way Employes which reads as
follows:
An employee desiring to be absent from service must obtain
permission from his foreman or the proper officer. In case an
employee is unavoidably kept from work, he must be able to
furnish proof of his inability to notify his foreman or proper
officer.
A formal hearing was held on July 21, 1989, and as a result,
Claimant was dismissed from service. The Organization thereafter
filed a claim on Claimant's behalf, challenging his dismissal.
This Board has reviewed the evidence and testimony in this case
and we find that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support
the finding that the Claimant was guilty of habitual absenteeism. The
record is clear that the Claimant did not work at all in the months of
September, October, November, and December 1988. That type of record
is atrocious, and the Carrier had sufficient right to issue discipline
to him.
Once this Board has determined that there is sufficient evidence
S6/1 /0.3-7
C a.se
a
in the record to support -he guilty finding, we nex~ turn our
attention to the type of discipline imposed. This Board will not set
aside a Carrier's imposition of discipline unless we find its action
to have been unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious.
The record demonstrates that the Claimant had previously been
issued two letters of caution and 35 days of suspension for chronic
absenteeism. Given that previous record this Board cannot find that
the Carrier acted arbitrarily when it terminated the Claimant's
employment. Therefore, the claim will be denied.
Award:
Claim denied
Ne ra
Carrier Member
Date:
S)--Ly&
L/ U
6~1
Organizatio Me er