J ,



BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES

and

SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
















0

the employees' responsibility to be at work promptly on each day.
Once this Board has determined that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the guilty finding, we next turn our attention to the type of discipline imposed. This Board will not set aside a Carrier's imposition of discipline unless we find its action to have been unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious.
The Claimant's record reveals that he began his employment with the Carrier in 1990. He was issued a ten-day suspension for excessive absenteeism and tardiness in June of 1994 and a 20-day suspension for excessive absenteeism in January of 1995. Consequently, this Board cannot find that it was unreasonable or arbitrary to issue the Claimant a 40-day suspension for this latest similar incident of wrongdoing. The Claimant should be put on notice that any future incidents of this kind will most assuredly result in more serious discipline or discharge. AWARD






Carrier Member J Organizaiion Member
DATED: DATED: