BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES

and

CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY


Case No. 47 STATEMENT OF CLAIM:



FINDINGS:
On June 13, 1997, the Claimant, Jeff J. Schnelle, received notice from the Carrier instructing him to appear for a formal investigation into the charges that he was absent from work from September 11, 1995, until the present time allegedly under false pretense of an injury restriction sufficient to prevent him from working.
On September 28, 1997, the Carrier notified the Claimant that he had been found guilty of all charges. Consequently, he was assessed discipline of a five-day actual suspension from service.


This Board has reviewed the extensive evidence, testimony, and surveillance reports in the record and we find that the Carrier has not met its burden of proof that the Claimant was absent under false pretenses subsequent to September 11, 1995. The Board has reviewed the surveillance reports which indicated without question that the Claimant was performing physical work on several occasions. However, there was insufficient
10140-T~

proof that that work fell outside of his physical restrictions. It appears from the record that the Claimant desired to go back to work at anyone of a number of jobs. The Carrier did not put him back to work. He did help out a friend on several dates in April and May of 1997. However, the fact that he did that work does not necessarily mean that he was absent under false pretense. Therefore, the claim must be sustained. AWARD


he shall be made whole.

Dated: December 16, 1997

PETER . MEI' RS, Neutr I Member