AWARD N0.130 Parties to Dispute:







Statement of Claim:





Upon the whole record and all the evidence, after hearing, the Board finds that the parties herein are carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and this board is duly constituted by agreement under Public Law 89-456 and has jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter.



After thoroughly reviewing and considering the record and the parties' presentations, the Board finds that the claim should be disposed of as follows:

The record contains substantial evidence that Claimant failed to protect his assignment on April 22, 2003, when he failed to call in and was absent, and on April 23, 2003, when he called in late. Claimant did call in his absence on April 21, 2003, and requested use of a vacation day to attend a funeral. He was told to bring in documentation. The documentation that he brought in did not substantiate that the funeral took place on April 21. Furthermore, the record reflected that Claimant was absent without permission and without calling on January 23 and 24, and March 17 and 18, 2003. Accordingly, we find that Carrier proved the charge of excessive absenteeism by substantial evidence.

However, considering all of the facts and circumstances, particularly Claimant's 26 years of service, we find the penalty of dismissal to be excessive. Claimant shall be reinstated to service with seniority unimpaired but without compensation for time held out of s rvice.

                        M. H. Malin

                    Chairman and Neutral Member


                                      _Y~ 2 I/.t~i

DDa D. L. Kerby
Organ tion Member Carrier Member
Issued at Chicago, Illinois on September 29, 2004