SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO. 1049
Award NO. 108
Parties to Dispute:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
AND
Norfolk Southern Railway
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
:
Claim on behalf of L. B. Bellamy, requesting that he be made whole
with pay for all time lost with seniority, vacation, and all other rights
unimpaired by exonerating him of the ninety (90) day actual suspension
which resulted from the formal investigation held on March 18, 1999, for
his responsibility in connection with his improper performance of and
inattention to duties as a laborer, in that on January 13, 1999, at
milepost NO-30.6, Barrett, Mississippi, while working on Gang R-1 B,
Claimant refused to give up a five-gallon bucket to prevent a hydraulic
oil spill to the ground.
(Carrier File MW-ROAN-99-02-SG-003)
Upon the whole record and all the evidence, after hearing, the Board finds that the
parties herein are carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as amended, and this board is duly constituted by agreement under Public Law 89456 and has jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter.
This award is based on the facts and circumstances of this particular case and shall
not serve as a precedent in any other case.
AWARD
After thoroughly reviewing and considering the transcript and the parties'
presentations, the Board finds that the claim should be disposed of as follows:
Claimant initially was dismissed for improper performance of and inattention to his
duties. Carrier subsequently reduced Claimant's dismissal to a 90-day suspension.
The record reveals that on January 13, 1999, Claimant was sitting on an overturned
five-gallon bucket. A machine operator and a repairman needed the bucket for
draining hydraulic oil from a pettibone swingmaster machine. Claimant gave them
the
bucket with great reluctance. Claimant then took another empty bucket and sat
on it. When the machine operator and repairmen requested that bucket to catch the
remaining oil, Claimant used profanity and refused to give it up. Accordingly, we
conclude that Carrier proved Claimant's guilty by substantial evidence.
However, considering all of the surrounding circumstances, we find that a 90-day
suspension is excessive. We will reduce the suspension to sixty days. Carrier is
ordered to compensate Claimant for time lost, except for the first sixty days of the
suspension
M. H. Malin
_2 ~ _
R. A. Lau D. L. Kerb
Organization Member Carrier Member
Issued at Chicago, IL on December 21, 1999
2