SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 1049
CASE NO. 178
Parties to Dispute:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
AND
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
(Carrier's File: MW-GNVL-06-14-SG-258)
Statement of Claim:
Claim on behalf of S. H. Nitzschke, 11 for reinstatement to service with seniority, vacation and all
other rights unimpaired and pay for all time lost as a result of his dismissal from service following a
formal investigation on July 18, 2007, in connection with his violation of Norfolk Southern Safety
and General Conduct Rule, GR-12, concerning having a firearm in his possession on Company
property while occupying Carrier provided camp car facilities on June 20, 2007.
Upon the whole record and all the evidence, after hearing, the Board finds that the parties herein are
Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and this Board is
duly constituted by agreement under Public Law 89-456 and has jurisdiction of the parties and
subject matter.
This Award is based on the facts and circumstances of this particular case and shall not serve as a
precedent in any other case.
AWARD
After thoroughly reviewing and considering the transcript and the parties' presentation, the Board
finds that the claim should be disposed of as follows:
BACKGROUND
S. H. Nitzschke, 11, the Claimant herein, entered the Carrier's service on April 15, 2007 as a
Laborer.
The instant matter concerns the propriety of the Carrier's decision to dismiss the Claimant for his
possession of a frearm in the Company provided camp car while working his regular assignment on
1
~)bA NU- lU4y
AWARD 178
Timber and Surfacing Gang TS-2, a traveling crew that was lodged in Carrier provided camp cars
parked in the vicinity of the work location.
DISCUSSION
Initially, this Board notes that it sits as a reviewing body and does not engage in making
de novo
findings. Accordingly, we must accept those findings made by the Carrier on the Property,
including determinations of credibility, provided they bear a rational relationship to the record.
At the investigation, the Carrier sustained its burden of proof by establishing, through substantive
credible evidence, that the Claimant took a handgun from under his pillow on his camp car bunk,
tucked it into the waist of his pants where it was concealed walked to the other end of the camp car,
engaged in a somewhat agitated verbal exchange with co-workers. The exchange was prompted by
the Claimant's comments about "stepping outside" to settle matters during which the Claimant
stated, in words of substance, that "one does not bring knives to a gun fight." The Claimant then
replaced his handgun under the pillow on his bunk. Two co-workers credibly testified seeing a gun
in the Claimant's possession and other co-workers credibly testified that they heard the Claimant
make remarks that implied that he had a gun. Given that the Carrier has carried its burden of proof,
there remains a question of the appropriate penalty.
Safety and General Conduct Rule GR-12 expressly prohibits the possession of a firearm on
Company property. or while occupying Company provided vehicles. The record evidence confirms
that the Claimant was well aware of this Rule as well as the rationale for banning gun possession on
the property. This Rule was specifically designed as part of the Carrier's commitment to provide a
safe work environment for its employees. Indeed, in our society the carrying of a concealed weapon
poses the potential threat of a fatal injury where a volatile dispute might arise among two or more
employees. Simply put, there is simply no excuse for the Claimant to have possessed a weapon
while on Company property.
2
SBA NO. 1049
AWARD 178
Given these undeniable facts, together with the Claimant's short tenure with the Carrier, this Board
cannot find the Carrier's action in dismissing the Claimant to have been unreasonable, arbitrary or
capricious. Accordingly, the claim must be denied.
CONCLUSION
The Claim is denied.
agna
~iairr~v~eutra Member
`)~ .20©&'
D.L. K
Carrier Member
Dated Mav 31, 2008