Parties to Dispute:







Statement of Claim:





Upon the whole record and all the evidence, after hearing, the Board finds that the parties herein are carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and this board is duly constituted by agreement under Public Law 89-456 and has jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter.

                        AWARD


After thoroughly reviewing and considering the record and the parties' presentations, the Board finds that the claim should be disposed of as follows:

The record reflects that on December 15, 2008, Claimant was tramming his Tie Handling Machine when he collided with the rear cart of the Tie Handling Machine that he was following. Although Claimant maintained that the brakes were defective, a mechanical check found no defects. It is clear that Claimant failed to comply with Rule 814 which requires being able to stop within half the range of vision. Furthermore, the evidence established that Claimant failed to promptly report the accident to his supervisor. Instead he waited an hour and ten minutes before reporting the accident and then did so only after his efforts to repair the damage to his machine by himself were unsuccessful. We conclude that Carrier proved the charges by substantial evidence.
                                              SBA No. 1049 Award 196


In the instant case, however, considering all of its peculiar facts and circumstances, we find the penalty of dismissal to be excessive. Claimant shall be reinstated to service but without compensation for time held out of service and he shall forfeit his Machine Operator seniority.

                        M. H. Malin

                    Chairman and Neutral Member


T. W. Kreke D. L. Kerb
Organization Member Carrier Member
Issued at Chicago, Illinois on September 24, 2009