PARTIES TO DISPUTE:







Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:














FIND

This Board, upon the whole record and all of the evidence, finds and holds as follows:

1. That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute are, respectively, carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended,; and



THE BOARD

The record omits any persuasive evidence that the Carrier acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner by requiring the successful applicant for the foreman's position to have a valid commercial driver's license. Although the relevant work assignment did not require the current use of a truck and therefore the personnel did not possess a truck as a general practice, the Carrier had a right to maintain future flexibility by being prepared for those situations when the use of a truck might become necessary.


Insofar as the record indicates that the Claimant lacked such a license, the Carrier therefore did not violate the Agreement by failing to assign the Claimant to the position. In addition, the present dispute only involves Claimant Graves because any reference to E.J. Faircloth as another Claimant would generate inappropriate duplicative claims arising from the same occurrence.

AWARD:

The Claim is denied in accordance with the Opinion of the Board.

                    Robert L. Douglas

                Chairman and Neutral. Member


66nald' Bartholoma t Patricia A. Madden
Employee Carrier Member

Dated: ~~-=
                    `/


2