SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 1110
Award No. 128
Case No. 128
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
and
CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Louisville and
Nashville Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
1. The Agreement was violated when the
Carrier assigned outside forces (Alabama
State Highway Department) to perform Bridge
and Building Subdepartment work of
constructing a retaining wall on the
carrier's right of way near Bangor, Alabama
at Mile Post 355.1 on the Birmingham
Seniority District on August 12, 13 and 14,
1998 [System File 34(31)(98)/12(99-51) LNR].
2. The Agreement was further violated when
the Carrier failed to furnish the General
Chairman with a proper advance written notice
of its intention to contract out said work as
required by Article IV of the 1968 National
Agreement and failed to make a good-faith
effort to reduce the incidence of contracting
out scope covered work and increase the use
of its Maintenance of Way forces as required
by the December 11, 1981 Letter of
Understanding.
3. As a consequence of the violations
referred to in Parts (1) and/or (2) above,
Claimants J. S. Hood, R. H. Tyler, Jr., D. A.
Shannon, III and J. L. Holloway shall each be
paid eight (8) hours for each date listed
above, at their respective straight time
rates of pay.
1
SBA 1110-
Awd
fa8
FINDINGS:
This Board, upon the whole record and all of the evidence, finds
and holds as follows:
1. That the Carrier and the Employees involved in this
dispute are, respectively, carrier and Employees within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended,; and
2. That the Board has jurisdiction over this dispute.
OPINION OF THE BOARD:
Article IV, Contracting out, provides:
In the event a carrier plans to contract
out work within the scope of the applicable
schedule agreement, the carrier shall notify
the General Chairman of the organization
involved in writing as far in advance of the
date of the contracting transaction as is
practicable and in any event not less than 15
days prior thereto.
If the General Chairman, or his
representative, requests a meeting to discuss
the matters relating to the said contracting
transaction, the designated representative of
the carrier shall promptly meet with him for
that purpose. Said carrier and organization
representatives shall make a good faith
attempt to reach an understanding concerning
said contracting, but if no understanding is
reached the carrier may nevertheless proceed
with said contracting, and the organization
may file and progress claims in connection
therewith.
The record indicates that the State of Alabama originated,
initiated, and implemented the idea to perform the disputed work
in connection with the widening of a road. As a result, a need
arose to provide additional fill. Such circumstances generated a
further need to increase the height of the referenced retaining
wall.
A careful review of the record confirms that the State of Alabama
performed the construction project without any involvement,
participation, or control by the Carrier. The Carrier merely
provided flagging protection in connection with the performance
of the disputed work.
Under these precise circumstances, the Carrier did not have a
2
ssAnio-
AWd IQ?
duty to provide advance notice to the organization about the
performance of the disputed work. As a result, no basis exists
to sustain the Claim.
AWARD:
The claim is denied in accordance with the opinion of the Board.
Robert L. Do4las
Chairman and Neutral Member
D nald \D~Bartholontgyy Mark D. Selbert
Employe Member Carrier Member
Dated:
~'~-~a~UL
3