SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 1110
Award No. 137
Case No. 137
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
and
CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Louisville and
Nashville Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
1. The Carrier violated the Agreement when it assigned
Welder R. K. Orr and his Welder Helper to perform Track
Subdepartment work (pulling spikes, knocking off anchors,
re-applying anchors, taking off joint bars, spacing track
ties, tamping ties, etc.) on July 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20,
21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 31, August 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
14, 15, 16, 18, 23, 24, 25, 29, 30 and 31, 1995 between Mile
Post N-47.1 and Mile Post F-292.0 on the Nashville Seniority
District. [System File 14(59)(95)/12(95-1299) LNR].
2. As a consequence of the aforestated violation, Nashville
Division furloughed Track Repairman R. A. Foster and Track
Repairman G. L. Hedge shall be allowed eight (8) hours
straight time pay at their appropriate Track Subdepartment
rate for each day during the months of July and August 1995
that the violation occurred.
FINDINGS:
This Board, upon the whole record and all of the evidence, finds
and holds as follows:
1. That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this
dispute are, respectively, Carrier and Employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended,; and
2. That the Board has jurisdiction over this dispute.
OPINION OF THE BOARD:
Appendix 34 provides, in pertinent part, that:
1
SBAIII0-Awa 13'1
in the future on all Seniority Districts of
this Company when field welds are being made
a track repairman will be assigned to work
with the welding gang to perform the track
work unless the ties have already been spread
to permit the field weld and that we will not
be presented time claims that the welding
gang is performing track sub-department work
and also time claims that the track repairman
is performing welding sub-department work.
This dispute involves an allegation about the performance of
scope covered work by a Welder and a Welder Helper, who did not
possess active seniority under the Agreement in the Track
Subdepartment. The Welder and the Welder Helper did possess
active seniority under the Agreement in the Welding
Subdepartment.
Rule 3 and Rule 5 differentiate between the Track Subdepartment
and the Welding Subdepartment. Employees covered by the
Agreement accrue seniority in such different subdepartments.
The critical inquiry therefore requires a determination of
whether the Welder and Welder Helper performed track work
incidental to their primary work of welding or whether they
performed a substantial and significant quantity of track work
that warranted the assignment of the Claimants from the Track
Subdepartment to perform such work.
A careful review of the record reflects that Welder Orr alleged
that he and a Welder Helper had performed the disputed work.
Welder Orr indicated the specific nature of the disputed work.
The Roadmaster confirmed that Welder Orr had received
instructions to perform certain work that included making certain
field welds. In performing such work, the record substantiates
that Welder Orr also performed the disputed track repairman's
work.
The record indicates that Welder Orr was on vacation on August 2,
August 3, and August 4, 1995. As a result, Welder Orr did not
perform the disputed track repairman's work on these three dates.
With respect to the remaining dates, however, such work occurred
and caused the loss of certain work opportunities for Claimant
Foster. As a result, Claimant Foster shall receive 8 hours' pay
at the Track Repairman's straight time rate of pay for the
remaining 28 dates.
AWARD:
The Claim is sustained in accordance with the Opinion of the
Board. The Carrier shall make the Award effective on or before
2
s8AIII0-AcA 137
6o days following the date of this Award.
obert L. Do as
Chairman and Neut al Member
Donald D"artholomay Mark D. Selbert
Employee tuber ~1 Carrier Member
Dated:
3