SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 1110
Award No. 139
Case No. 139
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
and
CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Louisville and
Nashville Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
1. The Carrier violated the Agreement when it assigned
Welders R. K. Orr and M. R. Pinkley to perform Track
Repairman's work (spacing of ties, pulling and redriving
spikes, knocking off and reapplyihg anchors and tamping
ties) while making field welds on June 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 13,
14, 16, 21,.22, 24, 27, 28 and 29, 1994 between Mile Post
6.5 and Mile Post 116.5 on the Nashville Division. [System
File 14(47)(94)/12(94-867) LNR].
2. As a consequence of the aforestated violation,
furloughed Track Repairman G. L. Hedge and furloughed Track
Repairman R. A. Foster shall each be allowed eight (8) hours
straight time pay at their appropriate Track Subdepartment
rate for each day during the months of June 1994 that the
violation occurred.
FINDINGS:
This Board, upon the whole record and all of the evidence, finds
and holds as follows:
1. That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this
dispute are, respectively, Carrier and Employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended,; and
2. That the Board has jurisdiction over this dispute.
OPINION OF THE BOARD:
Appendix 34 provides, in pertinent part, that:
1
snn
1110
- n
u_~ 139
in the future on all Seniority Districts of
this Company when field welds are being made
a track repairman will be assigned to work
with the welding gang to perform the track
work unless the ties have already been spread
to permit the field weld and that we will not
be presented time claims that the welding
gang is performing track sub-department work
and also time claims that the track repairman
is performing welding sub-department work.
This dispute involves an allegation about the performance of
scope covered work by a Welder and a Welder Helper, who did not
possess active seniority under the Agreement in the Track
Subdepartment. The Welder and the Welders Helper did possess
active seniority under the Agreement in the Welding
Subdepartment.
Rule 3 and Rule 5 differentiate between the Track Subdepartment
and the Welding Subdepartment. Employees covered by the
Agreement accrue seniority in such different subdepartments.
The critical inquiry therefore requires a determination of
whether the Welder and Welder Helper performed track work
incidental to their primary work of welding or whether they
performed a substantial and significant quantity of track work
that warranted the assignment of the Claimants from the Track
Subdepartment to perform such work.
A careful review of the record reflects that Welder Orr alleged
that he and Welder Helper Pinkley had performed the disputed
work. Welder Orr indicated the specific nature of the disputed
work.
The record confirms that Welder Orr had received instructions to
perform certain work that included making certain field welds.
In performing such work, the record substantiates that Welder Orr
and Welder Helper Pinkley also performed the disputed Track
Repairman's work.
The record establishes that the performance of such work
occurred. By permitting the Welder and Welder Helper to perform
the disputed work, the furloughed Claimants lost certain work
opportunities. As a result, the Claimants shall receive an equal
proportionate share of 8 hours' pay (i.e. 4 hours' pay for each
of the two Claimants) at the Track Repairman's straight time rate
of pay for each date that the violations occurred in June 1994.
AWARD:
The Claim is sustained in accordance with the Opinion of the
Board. The Carrier shall make the Award effective on or before
2
SBA II10- Awd 139
60 days following the date of this Award.
Rbbert L. Dou as
Chairman and Neutral Member
D
9471d
. BarthoTf
Employee Sember
Dated:
1d-I-oI
Mark D. Selbert
Carrier Member