SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 1110
Award No. 142
Case No. 142
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
and
CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Louisville and
Nashville Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
1. The Carrier violated Appendix 34 of the Agreement when
it assigned Welder R. K. Orr and Welder Helper M. R. Pinkley
to make field welds on January 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12 and
14, 1994 and caused them to perform Track Subdepartment work
(moving joint bars, pulling spikes, re-spiking, spacing
ties, tamping ties, taking off anchors, putting anchors back
on the rail, and dressing the ballast section). [System File
14(4)(94)/12(94-630) LNR].
2. As a consequence of the aforestated violation, Nashville
Division furloughed Track Repairmen B. J. Spicer and Track
Repairman R. A. Foster shall be allowed eight (8) hours
straight time pay at their appropriate Track Subdepartment
rate for each day during the month of January 1994 that the
violation occurred.
FINDINGS:
This Board, upon the whole record and all of the evidence, finds
and holds as follows:
1. That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this
dispute are, respectively, carrier and Employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended,; and
2. That the Board has jurisdiction over this dispute.
OPINION OF THE BOARD:
Appendix 34 provides, in pertinent part, that:
1
SBA II10 - AWd
rye.
in the future on all Seniority Districts of
this Company when field welds are being made
a track repairman will be assigned to work
with the welding gang to perform the track
work unless the ties have already been spread
to permit the field weld and that we will not
be presented time claims that the welding
gang is performing track sub-department work
and also time claims that the track repairman
is performing welding sub-department work.
This dispute involves an allegation about the performance of
scope covered work by a Welder and a Welder Helper, who did not
possess active seniority under the Agreement in the Track
Subdepartment. The Welder and the Welder Helper did possess
active seniority under the Agreement in the Welding
Subdepartment.
Rule 3 and Rule 5 differentiate between the Track Subdepartment
and the Welding Subdepartment. Employees covered by the
Agreement accrue seniority in such different subdepartments.
The critical inquiry therefore requires a determination of
whether the Welder and Welder Helper performed track work
incidental to their primary work of welding or whether they
performed a substantial and significant quantity of track work
that warranted the assignment of the Claimants from the Track
Subdepartment to perform such work.
A careful review of the record reflects that Welder Orr alleged
that he and a Welder Helper had performed the disputed work.
Welder Orr indicated the specific nature of the disputed work.
The Roadmaster confirmed that Welder Orr had received
instructions to perform certain work that included making certain
field welds. In performing such work, the record substantiates
that Welder Orr also performed a significant amount of the
disputed Track Repairman's work.
The record proves that the performance of the disputed work by
the Welder and the Welder Helper occurred. The record further
proves that the performance of such work caused the loss of
certain work opportunities for furloughed Claimant Spicer and for
furloughed Claimant Foster. As a result, each Claimant shall
receive an equal proportionate share of 8 hours' pay (i.e. 4
hours' pay for each Claimant for each date) at the Track
Repairman's straight time rate of pay for each of the dates
covered by the Claim.
AWARD:
The Claim is sustained in accordance with the Opinion of the
Board. The Carrier shall make the Award effective on or before
2
seA
1110
- Awd i y
sl
60 days following the date of this Award.
Robert L.
DoucOs
chairman and Neutral Member
D
nald . Bartholon Mark D. Selbert
Employee ember Carrier Member
Dated:
~to
- I ·O I
3