SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 1110
Award No. 151
Case No. 151
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
and
CSX Transportation, Inc.
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
1. The Agreement was violated when, on January 21, 2000,
the Carrier abolished the position of trackman on Gang 5C18
and thereafter assigned the trackman duties to Foreman D. L.
Hammac and Truck Driver A. W. Goins [System File
G38608100/12(00-0276) CSX].
2. As a consequence of the violation referred to in Part
(1) above, ". . . the trackman position on force 5C18 should
be put back on, K. R. Marple should be allowed forty (40)
hours straight time and 32? hours time and one half at the
trackman's respective straight time and time and one half
rates of pay for the dates of January 22, 24, 25, 26 and 28,
2000 and should be paid continuous for all straight time and
overtime hours worked until violation is corrected.
FINDINGS:
This Board, upon the whole record and all of the evidence, finds
and holds as follows:
1. That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this
dispute are, respectively, Carrier and Employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended,; and
2. That the Board has jurisdiction over this dispute.
OPINION OF THE BOARD:
Rule 1 (Seniority Classes) provides, in pertinent part:
The seniority classes and primary duties of each class
are:
1
SBA w0
Track Department
B. Track Roster:
1. Track foreman
Direct employees assigned under his jurisdiction.
2. Assistant Foreman
Direct and work with employees assigned to him
under the supervision of a foreman.
3. Trackman
construct, maintain, repair, inspect and dismantle
track and appurtenances thereto.
D. Vehicle Operator Roster:
Vehicle Operator
Vehicle Operator operates all highway or rail-highway
vehicles:
Boom Trucks
Dump Trucks
Log Loaders
Grapple Trucks
Semi-LowBoy
Buses
Fuel Trucks
Six Man Pick-up Trucks
Rule 3 (Selection of Positions) provides, in pertinent part:
Section 1. Assignment to position.
In the assignment of employees to positions under
this Agreement, seniority shall govern. The word
"seniority" as used in this Rule means, first,
seniority in the class in which the assignment is to be
made, and thereafter, in the lower classes,
respectively, in the same group in the order in which
they appear on the seniority district roster. If
required, the awardee will be given equal and fair
instruction and training up to period of thirty (30)
days depending on the position in order to become
qualified for the position. Employees making
application for or bidding advertised positions that do
not possess seniority in the class will be given
preference as follows:
Section 3. Advertisement and award.
2
SS A 1110
Awd 151
(a) All positions and vacancies will be advertised
within thirty (30) days previous to or within twenty
(20) days following the dates they occur. The
advertisement shall show position title, rate of pay,
headquarters, tour of duty, rest days and designated
meal period.
(h) Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, it
is understood that an employee shall be assigned duties
associated with the job class he was assigned by
bulletin award.
(I) All vacancies must be filled or proper abolishment
notice posted.
Section 4. Filling temporary vacancies
(a) A position or vacancy may be filled temporarily
pending assignment. When new positions or vacancies
occur, the senior qualified available employees will be
given preference, whether working in a lower rated
position or in the same grade or class pending
advertisement and award. When furloughed employees are
to be used to fill positions under this Section, the
senior qualified furloughed employees in the seniority
district shall be offered the opportunity to return to
service. Such employees who return and are not awarded
a position or assigned to another vacancy shall return
to furlough status.
Rule 19 (Assignment to Higher or Lower Rated Positions) provides:
An employee may be temporarily assigned to different
classes of work within the range of his ability. In
filling the position which pays a higher rate, he shall
receive such rate for the time thus employed, except,
if assigned for more than four (4) hours, he shall
receive the higher rate for the entire tour. If
assigned to a lower rated position, he will be paid the
rate of his regular position.
Rule 1 contains clear, explicit, and plain language to identify
the "primary duties" of each class. The critical clause "primary
duties" signifies that the parties carefully agreed to limit the
range of the "primary" tasks that the employees in different
classes perform. By using the term "primary" in Rule 1, the
parties recognized that employees may perform secondary tasks
beyond the fundamental and most important purpose of the class.
Rule 3 and Rule 19 concern the method of assigning work, but do
not cancel, negate, or rescind Rule 1.
3
SQA II10
Aced 15I
A careful review of the present record indicates that the Carrier
abolished the position of Trackman on January 21, 2000.
Nevertheless, the Carrier continued to have the substantial
amount
of
primary work ordinarily and customarily performed by a
Trackman (such as repairing broken rail, changing out rail
defects, filling and lighting switch heaters, and tamping muddy
spots at a crossing) performed by other employees. The
performance by the other employees of duties that are not their
own primary duties may not supersede or infringe upon their own
primary duties nor supplant a Trackman.
The record contains unrefuted evidence that the disputed work
performed by the Foreman and/or Vehicle Operator constituted a
substantial and preponderant amount of the primary duties of a
Trackman--not a Foreman and/or a Vehicle Operator--on a day-today basis beginning on January 22, 2000. Such work did not
constitute incidental work or insignificant work. The record
contains unrefuted evidence that the disputed work constituted a
substantial amount of the primary work performed by a Trackman.
In the absence of an emergency situation or any other extenuating
circumstances, a Trackman constituted the appropriate employee to
perform the disputed work. Any change to this arrangement is a
matter for collective bargaining, not arbitration.
The Organization proved the claim by a preponderance of the
evidence. As to the remedy, the portion of the request of the
Organization that the Carrier re-establish the Trackman position
on Gang 5C18 is beyond the authority of this Board. The Board,
however, grants the monetary portion of the relief sought.
Lastly, the Carrier's submission contains a rationalization of
work performed and time expended. The Carrier did not make these
contentions during the on-property handling of the dispute and
the Board may not consider "de novo" arguments and material.
AWARD:
The Claim is sustained in accordance with the Opinion of the
Board. The Carrier shall make the Award effective on or before
60 days following the date of this Award.
Robert L. D las
Chairman and Neutral Member
D. Bartholom . T. Kli zak
Empl yee Member Carrier nber
Dated:
v
4
SBA (IIU
Awd I 5 I
CARRIER'S DISSENT TO
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO. 1110
AWARD NO. 151
The Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes (BMWE)
in its claim asserted that the performance of duties by a
Foreman and Vehicle Operator in the absence of a Trackman
violated the Agreement.
The Arbitrator rationalized that because there was no
Trackman assigned to a Gang, there must have been a
violation of the Agreement. The Agreement does not provide
exclusive rights to any work for any particular Class of
worker in the Craft and no manning levels or Gang
complement requirements. Yet, the Arbitrator's decision is
based on such premises. Too, the Arbitrator's decision,
for lack of clear contract language or a fully developed
record of restrictive assignment and performance of work,
as well as a BMWE position based solely on refuted
assertions, is based on conjecture, hypothesis and
speculation.
The Board was apprised during the hearings of
contemporary arbitral decision, adding to the wealth of
precedent cited in the Carrier's submission supporting that
the claim be denied. See Public Law Board No. 6564, Award
No. 10 [BMWE v. CSXT (Parker), 03/24/04].
Award No. 151 is palpably erroneous and CSXT dissents.
mes T. liak
arrle _S
rrle Membe -SBA No. 1110
April 30, 2004