BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
and
NORTHEAST ILLINOIS REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORPORATION
(Metra)
NM13 Case No. 30
This dispute involves Mr. Michael Asher, Machine Operator for Metra, who was the Claimant in NMB Case No. 28 which was recently before this Board for adjudication.
In NM13 Case No. 28, Mr. Asher was charged by the Carrier for violation of Carrier Rules for his unauthorized use of Metra's time and Vehicle #91061 in spreading salt in a parking lot at an apartment complex at 11020 through 11032 S. 76`" Avenue in Palos Hills, Illinois, on Tuesday, January 14, 2003.
In NM13 Case No. 28, this Board, after a review of the transcript record in that case, rendered a decision on April 11, 2003, which upheld the Carrier's decision to dismiss Mr. Asher from service. Mr. Asher was dismissed from service effective February 7, 2003.
The instant dispute initiated by the Carrier on February 7, 2003, involves a charge against Mr. Asher for dishonesty in giving false information at the investigation on January 30, 2003, concerning the route of the company vehicle Mr. Asher was driving when entering the parking lot of the apartment complex at 11020 through 11032 S. 76`h Avenue in Palos Hills, Illinois, on January 14, 2003.
This Board in our decision in NMB Case No. 28 gave great weight to the testimony of Mr. Cashman, the witness who observed Mr. Asher and Metra truck #91061 which he was driving in the apartment complex on January 14, 2003.
Mr. Cashman's testimony in the record of NMB Case No. 28 describing the activities of the truck was clear and precise as to what took place.
Mr. Asher's testimony differed from Mr. Cashman's testimony on other points such as the spreading of salt, as well as, how he entered the complex with his truck.
The Board took note of the testimony of Mr. Asher concerning a rear entrance to the apartment complex from the bowling alley on Southwest Highway.
The Board also noted the testimony of Martin DeVito, a fellow employee who resides in the apartment complex where Mr. Asher was observed by Mr. Cashman spreading salt with Metra Vehicle #91061.
Mr. DeVito initially testified that there was no rear entrance to the parking lot of the apartment complex from the bowling alley; however, he changed his story in further questioning by the Organization Representative.
It was on this point that the Carrier took note and made an investigation of the site at the apartment complex and found that there is no rear entrance to the apartment complex parking lot from the bowling alley which gave rise to the dispute before us in NMB Case No. 30.
It is clear from the testimony of Mr. Asher in this dispute that he was dishonest in his testimony at the investigation held on January 30, 2003, as charged by the Carrier.
It is clear that the record in this dispute reaffirms the decision of the Board in NMB Case No. 28 wherein we upheld the decision of the Carrier to dismiss Mr. Asher from service based on the credible testimony of Mr. Cashman, the witness, and the inconsistencies in the testimony of Mr. Asher and Mr. DeVito, the fellow employee who testified at the January 30, 2003, investigation.
For the record, we are attaching the letter of February 7, 2003, calling for the investigation in this dispute and also the letter of March 3, 2003, dismissing Mr. Asher from service.
The transcript of the investigation held on February 14, 2003, provides the basis for this Board's adjudication of this dispute.
This dispute is before this Special Board of Adjustment established by agreement between the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes and the Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation (Metra) dated November 12, 1999. SBA No. 1122.
Based on the foregoing, it is the decision of this Board that the claim in this dispute be denied which is consistent with our decision of April 11, 2003, in NMB
You are hereby instructed to attend a formal investigation that will be held in the office of the Director ofEngineering, Rock Island District, 2067 W.123" Street, Blue Island, Illinois, on February 14, 2003 at 9:00 am..
The purpose for this investigation is to develop the facts, determine the cause and assess responsibility, if any, in connection with your alleged dishonesty during an investigation held on January 30, 2003, when you allegedly gave false information concerning the route by which the company vehicle you were driving entered the parking lot of an apartment complex at 11020 through 11032 S. 76`" Avenue in Palos Hills, Illinois on January 14, 2003.
In connection, therewith, you are charged with the alleged violation of Metro Employee Conduct Rule N-Item 4, "Employees must not be dishonest".
You may be represented at this investigation as provided for in your labor agreement, and your representative will be given the opportunity to present evidence and testimony in your behalf and to cross examine any witnesses testifying against you,