BEFORE SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO. 1122
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
and
NORTHEAST ILLINOIS REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORPORATION
(Metra)
NMB Case No. 36
This dispute involves Mr. Eugene Howell employed by Metra as a B&B
Foreman and Mr. Curtis Streeter employed by Metra as a B&B Mechanic.
Mr. Howell and Mr. Streeter received a letter dated January 30, 2004, from
the Carrier instructing them to attend a formal investigation at 9:00 a.m. on
Thursday, February 5, 2004, for the purpose of developing the facts, determining
the cause, and assess responsibility, if any, in connection with their alleged
involvement in connection with a reported series of verbal altercations which took
place on Saturday, January 17, 2004, when Mr. Eugene Howell allegedly
confronted Mr. Curtis Streeter at Valois Restaurant, while Mr. Streeter was on
duty; and Mr. Curtis Streeter, on his Company issued Nextel phone, reportedly
made a threatening telephone call to Mr. Eugene Howell; while assigned as Metra
Electric B&B Foreman, headquartered at KYD; and Metra Electric B&B
Mechanic, headquartered at 14th Street, respectively.
In connection therewith, they were both charged with possible violation of
Metra Employee Conduct Rule N, Paragraphs 1, 2 & 3, Items 4 & 6.
The letter of January 30, 2004, is attached to this Award. The investigation
was held on February 5, 2004.
Following the investigation, Mr. Howell received a Notice of Discipline
letter dated February 23, 2004, dismissing him from service effective February 23,
2004, for violation of Metra Employee Conduct Rule N, Paragraphs 1, 2 & 3,
Items 4 & 6.
The transcript of the investigation held on February 5, 2004, provides the
basis for this Board's adjudication of this dispute.
This dispute is before this Special Board of Adjustment established by
agreement between the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes and the
Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation (Metra) dated
November 12, 1999. SBA No. 1122.
FINDINGS:
The incident that gave rise to this dispute occurred on Saturday, January 17,
2004, at Valois Restaurant where Mr. Curtis Streeter and two fellow Metra
employees, Mr. Trenidale Evans and Mr. Dennis Kowalski, had stopped by for
coffee.
The three Metra employees were on snow duty assignment which entailed
cleaning Metra station platforms, removing snow and ice and spreading salt.
While in the restaurant, Mr. Eugene Howell, a B&B Foreman, came in the
restaurant and allegedly walked up to Mr. Streeter and used profane language
which included the term "faggot."
z
SIsk
iiaa
Mr. Evans and Mr. Kowalski both testified at the investigation that Mr.
Howell used derogatory terms in addressing Mr. Streeter and invited Mr. Streeter
to step outside. Both employees testified that Mr. Streeter's reaction to the
confrontation by Mr. Howell consisted of "I can't believe you're doing this." Mr.
Howell then left the restaurant.
The record reveals that Mr. Howell was not on duty on Saturday, January
17, 2004, but had an appointment with his personal physician whose office was in
close proximity to the restaurant.
The testimony of Mr. Howell and Mr. Streeter in the transcript differs as to
what was said in the verbal altercation between them; however, there is no
variance with respect to the testimony of Mr. Evans and Mr. Kowalski as to what
transpired.
The record reveals that Mr. Howell filed a report with the Metra police that
Mr. Streeter had called him at his home later in the day and threatened him. Mr.
Streeter admitted to calling Mr. Howell but testified that he did not threaten him.
Once again, we have before us conflicting testimony by Mr. Howell and Mr.
Streeter. There is no way that we can prove or disprove what was said in the
phone conversation between Mr. Streeter and Mr. Howell.
Accordingly, the Board must confine itself to the issue before us in this
dispute which is the charge by the Carrier that Mr. Howell was responsible for the
verbal altercation that took place on Saturday, January 17, 2004, at Valois
Restaurant.
3
SBA IIQA
Awd
Slo
The record in the transcript testimony clearly reveals that Mr. Howell was
the instigator of the verbal confrontation with Mr. Streeter. The testimony of Mr.
Evans and Mr. Kowalski verifies that fact.
It is apparent to the Board that Mr. Howell ignored or forgot the incident
between Mr. Streeter and himself in a prior dispute which was before this Board in
NMB Case No. 32.
The Board found Mr. Howell guilty of the charge in that dispute, but
reinstated Mr. Howell on a leniency basis with a warning to him that any future
incidents could result in serious consequences.
Accordingly, based on the record before us, it is the decision of the Board
that Mr. Howell was guilty as charged by the Carrier in this dispute.
AWARD:
Claim denied.
Charles'. Chamberlain
Neutral Member
Date/ 0.1 ~ 7~0O
'v
4
ic~e 5 sB
ai13(o
W.
T. Archer - This is a formal investigation held pursuant to Notice of Investigation dated January 30, 2004, this
notice was sent out to Mr. Eugene Howell, Employee Number 2773; and Mr. Curtis Streeter, Employee Number 6234.
The notice reads as follows:
Metra Electric Engineering Department
KYD Facility
12301 So. Indiana Avenue
Chicago, IL 60628
January 30, 2004
FED EX TRACKING NO.: FED EX TRACKING NO.:
8383 6664 5076 8383 6664 5065
Mr. Eugene Howell, Emp. No. 2773 Mr. Curtis Streeter, Emp. No. 6234
11227 So. King Drive 6351 So. Rhodes Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60628 Chicago, Illinois 60637
"Gentlemen:
Arrange to attend a formal investigation to be held in the KYD Conference Room, 12301 So. Indiana Avenue,
Chicago, Illinois 60628, at 9:00 a.m., Thursday, February 5, 2004.
The purpose of this investigation is to develop the facts, determine the cause, and access responsibility, if any, in
connection with your alleged involvement in connection with a reported series of verbal altercations which took place
on Saturday, January 17, 2004, when Mr. Eugene Howell allegedly confronted Mr. Curtis Streeter at Valois
Restaurant, while Mr. Streeter was on duty; and Mr. Curtis Streeter , on his Company issued Nextel phone, reportedly
made a threatening telephone call to Mr. Eugene Howell; while assigned as Metra Electric B&B Foreman,
headquartered at KYD; and Metra Electric B&B Mechanic, headquartered at 14"' Street, respectively.
In connection therewith, you are both charged with possible violation of Metra Employee Conduct Rule N, Paragraphs
1,2 &3,Items4&6.
You may be represented at the subject investigation as provided for in your labor agreement, and you will be afforded
the opportunity to present evidence and testimony in your behalf, and to cross examine any witnesses testifying.
Your past personal records may be reviewed at this investigation (copy attached)."
Sincerely,
W. T. Archer, Director
Metra Electric Engineering Department
cc: V. L. Stoner G. Washington
W. K. Tupper F. Leonard
R. C. Schuster P. Connor
C. Cary H. J. Granier, G/C BMWE
J. Barton T. Petty, L/C BMWE
J. A. Bailey - Please arrange to appear as Company witnesses.
Capt. T. Dorsey -
D. Kowalski -
T. Evans -
1 \\ i
Pay.
to lqBAS 1141
NORTHEAST ILLINOIS REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORP.
NOTICE OF DISCIPLINE
Fed Ex 8383 6664 5087 February 23, 2004
Certified Mail No. Date
(Copy also sent U.S. Mail)
Mr. Eugene Howell, Emp. No. 2773
11227 So. King Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60628
Employee Name and Address
U Formal Investigation El Waiver of Formal Investigation (check proper box) has indicated your
responsibility for violation of NIRCRC Rules in the following incident (describe):
Charge:
Pursuant to Investigation held on February 5 2004: Your involvement
in a verbal altercation which took place on Saturday, January 17. ?_004,
Rule Violation:
Metra Employee Conduct Rule N Paragraphs 1 2 & 3 (Items 4&61 _
Therefore, you are assessed the following discipline which will also be entered into your personal
employment record (check appropriate box or boxes.)
0 1. Letter of Reprimand (letter attached, effective for two (2) years).
· If you waive investigation, the reprimand letter will be effective for one (1) year.
2. Three Work Days Deferred Suspension (this suspension will remain deferred for two (2) ~S
' 11~
years and will be served as actual suspension if further discipline is assessed during that period).
-_.12N ~Of~d'1-
· If you waive investigation, one (1) day of deferred suspension is assessed instead of three (3)
days.
El 3. Five Work Days Actual Suspension
· If you waive investigation, three (3) work days of suspension will be served instead of five (S)
work days, plus the deferred days from Step 2. During your suspension, you are expected to
contact the EAP Provider at
(312) 726-8620
or
1-800-227-8620
and schedule an interview.
Your record indicates deferred suspension of work day(s) which was assessed on
and must be served in conjunction with discipline noted above.
paG
,l SGA liac~-
Page 2
Awol 3 6
(Date)
0
4. Ten Work Dues Actual Suspension.
a
If you waive investigation, seven (7) work days of suspension will be served instead of ten
(10) work days.
5. Dismissal: Your employment with this corporation is terminated effective
02/23/04
(Date). You must immediately return all company property.
0
PERIOD OF SUSPENSIONaF APPLICABLE).
Suspension from your job assignment will begin on and will end
. You must return to work on . Failure
to return on that date will be regarded as an unauthorized absence.
DEVIATION FROM THE PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE STEPS
The Chief Operations Officer has determined that the discipline of Step # ,shall be
assessed based on the circumstance in this case for the reason(s) stated below:
l ~H~t-~
fvc_V
E~:~.Als
~r'r~
Signature & Title of Supervisor Assessing Discipline
l~,'oU ~ Z z3~f~
Time Date Employee
Union Witness
cc: V. L. Stoner
W. K. Tupper
R. C. Schuster
J. L. Barton
G. M. Washington
C. P. Cary
P. J. Connor
Director
General Chairman - U.S. Mail
Local Chairman - U.S. Mail
Revised 9/24/03