BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES

and

NORTHEAST ILLINOIS REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORPORATION

(Metra)

NMB Case No. 39


This dispute involves Mr. Walter Marusiak employed by Metra on a Class A Machine Operator Truck Driver position.

On September 22, 2004, Mr. Marusiak was sent a Certified letter requesting him to attend a formal investigation on Thursday, September 30, 2004, for the purpose of developing the facts, determine the cause and assess responsibility, if any, in connection with his alleged failure to properly protect his position as Machine Operator when he was absent without proper authority on Wednesday, September 22, 2004.

In connection therewith, Mr. Marusiak was charged with alleged violation of Rule Q - Metra Employee Conduct Rules and Engineering Department Special Instruction No. 1 Paragraph Nos. 4 & 6 concerning Metra's Engineering Department Attendance Policy.

The letter of September 22, 2004, calling for the investigation is attached to this Award.

At the request of the Organization, the investigation was postponed until October 1, 2004, and held on that date.


Following the investigation, Mr. Marusiak received a Notice of Discipline letter dated October 8, 2004, assessing him discipline of Three (3) work days deferred suspension as a result of the current Rules violation and three (3) work days actual suspension from Step Two (2) deferred assessed January 27, 2004, for previous Safety violation.

The Notice of Discipline letter of October 8, 2004, is attached to this Award.

The transcript of the investigation held on October 1, 2004, provides the basis for this Board's adjudication of this dispute.

This dispute is before this Special Board of Adjustment established by agreement between the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes and the Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation (Metra) dated November 12, 1999, SBA No. 1122.


FINDINGS:

The issue in this dispute is the alleged failure of Mr. Marusiak to properly protect his position on September 22, 2004, when he was absent without proper authority.

In our review of the transcript of the investigation held on October 1, 2004, the circumstances involved which led to Mr. Marusiak's absence on September 22, 2004, involved his wife who was pregnant and hospitalized to give birth to





                                        Awd Z9

their baby. Mr. Marnsiak testified that his wife developed complications which required inducement on September 21, 2004.

Mr. Marusiak worked on Monday, September 20, 2004, and had requested permission to be off on Tuesday, September 21, 2004, the date of the inducement.

Mr. Marusiak testified that his wife was not released from the hospital until Thursday, September 23, 2004, which required him to stay at home on September 22, 2004, to care for his two children, ages 6 and 9. Mr. Marusiak testified that he had made arrangements with his sister to care for them on Thursday, September 23, 2004.

It is clear from the record that there were extenuating circumstances in connection with family matters that Mr. Marusiak had to deal with on September 22, 2004.

The Carrier's Attendance Policy dated January 1, 2004, Carrier Exhibit #5, provides in part that:


    Rule "Q" of NIRCRC Employee Conduct Rules requires that "Employees must report at the appointed time, devote themselves exclusively to their duties, must not absent themselves, nor exchange duties with, or substitute others in their place, without proper authority."


    All absences involving personal days, court appearances, family and medical leave, non-emergency medical examinations or vacations require a 48-hour advance notice to the designated supervisor. However, emergency and unforeseen events can occur.* Supervisors have, at their discretion, the authority to issue personal and vacation days without this notice. Patterns of abuse will not be tolerated.

      *underscoring added


                        3

                                              s6A Ilda. Awrd 3q


      If an employee is going to be absent, for whatever reason, the

      employee must notify the designated supervisor prior to the start of

      the employees assignment. However, this notification does not

      automatically give an employee an authorized absence.

Mr. Marusiak was faced with an emergency and unforeseen event that justified his absence from work on September 22, 2004. Mr. Marusiak admitted that he did not call his Supervisor for permission to be off on that day. There is nothing in the record to show that there was a deliberate intent on the part of Mr. Marusiak to be absent without authority.

The discipline assessed Mr. Marusiak in this dispute was Three (3) work days deferred suspension which resulted in a Three (3) actual work days suspension being implemented because of prior discipline assessed on January 27, 2004.

In our review of the record and the circumstances involved, it is the opinion of the Board that the discipline assessed Mr. Marusiak was excessive. Accordingly, it is the decision of the Board that the appropriate measure of discipline accessed Mr. Marusiak in this dispute should be a Letter of Reprimand.

Accordingly, the Board directs that the Carrier revise Mr. Marusiak's record to reflect this decision of the Board.


4

                                                sn~, n as

                                                flwd 39


AWARD:

      Partially sustained in accordance with the above Findings.


                            ar~r-Gu-~w.~.~

                            CharleffJ. Chamberlain

                            Neutral Member


Date &c"~

s

                                                  s~llaa

                                                  Awd 3q


NORTHEAST ILLINOIS RAILROAD CORPORATION

Milwaukee District Engineering

2931 West Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60622


                NOTICE OF INVESTIGATION

September 22, 2004

US MAIL & CERTIFIED MAIL #7001 0360 0000 2765 8311
Mr. W. Marusiak, Machine Operator, #6608

Mr. Marusiak:

You are hereby instructed to attend a formal investigation which will be held in the office of the Director of Engineering, Milwaukee District, 2931 W. Chicago Ave, Chicago, Illinois 60622 on Thursday, September 30, 2004 at 9:00 A.M.


The purpose for this investigation is to develop the facts, determine the cause and assess responsibility, if any, in connection with your alleged failure to properly protect your position as Machine Operator when you were absent without the proper authority on Wednesday, September 22, 2004.


In connection therewith you are charged with alleged violation of the following rules: Rule Q- Metra Employee Conduct Rules and Engineering Department Special Instruction No. 1 Paragraph Nos. 4 & 6 concerning Metra's Engineering Department Attendance Policy.


Your personal work record will be reviewed at this investigation. (Copy attached)

You may be represented at this investigation as provided for in your labor agreement. Your representative will be given the opportunity to present evidence and testimony in your behalf and to cross-examine any witnesses testifying against you.


                    David P. Leahy, Maintenan ngineering Supervisor


G/C BMWE-WIMMER
L/C BMWE-KMIEC
V. L. Stoner
R. C. Schuster
W. K. Tupper
G. Washington
B. H. Smith
J. Barton
C. Cary
J. Bullock-----Please arrange to appear as a company witness
vv, _ Ot-T-OB-200.4 15:55 NETRTP HI EYJG OFO_ 1 ?09 293 611© P,O2

                                                      Auld 3cl


    NORTHEAST ILLINOIS REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORPORATION -Pagg'~'

    MILWAUKEE DISTRICT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

    2931 W. CHICAGO AVE., CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60622


                      NOTICE OF DISCIPLINE


      W. Marusiak #6608 Western Avenue _ David P_, Leahy

      Employee Name Work Location Supervisor assessing discipline


DATE: October 8. 2004

    X FORMAL INVESTIGATION SCHEDULED FOR SEi'TWBER 30 WAIVER OF INVESTIGATION

    2004, POSTPONED AND HELD OCTOBER 1, 2004


              Charge; Failure to protect your position as Machine Operator when you were absent without the proper authority on Wednesday, September 22, 2004


              Rule(s) Violation: Rule Q-Metra Employee Conduct Rules and Engineering Department Special Instruction No. 1 Paragraph Nos. 4 & 6 concerning Metra's Engineering DepartmnecAttendance Policy.


Therefore, you are assessed the following discipline which will also be entered into your personal employment record (check appropriate box or boxes).

                  formal Wary


p 1 . Formal Letter of Reprimand p 1. Formal Letter' of Reprimand
(effective for two years) (effective for one year)
® 2. Three (3) work days deferred suspension as a p 2. One (1) work day deferred suspension
result of the current Rules violation and three
(3) work days actual suspension from step two
(2) deferral assessed January 27, 2004 for
previous Safety violation.
p 3. Five (S) work days suspension plus the p 3. Three (3) work days suspension plus the deferred
deferred days from step two (2) days from step two (2). During your suspension,
you are expected to contact the FAP Coordinator
at 1.800.227.8620 or 312.726.8620.

Your record indicates a deferred suspension of 3 days) was assessed on la27 nuary . 2004 and must be
served in conjunction with discipline outlined above.

As a result, suspension will beginMondw,October 21.1(104 and end ~rdav. ~3 _QQA. You must return to work on Thursday. October 1 4,2004. Failure to return on that date will be treated as an unauthori2ed absence.
i
      'O`-T-OB-2DOa 15:55 ~1ETRR HI ENG OFC 1 708 29~ 6110 . P.Bl


                                            s~ A i r a a - A wd 39


    d a. Ten (10) work days suspension p 4. Seven (7) work days suspension


          As a result suspension will begin and end . You must return to work

          on . Failure to return on that date will be treated as an unauthorized absence.


    p 5. Dismissal p S. Dismissal


    p Your employment with this Corporation is terminated effective _ You must return all

    company property.

    p DEVIATION FROM THE PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE STEPS

    The Chief Operations Officer has determined that the discipline of Step #_ shall be assessed based on the

    circumstance in this case for the reasons) stated belo


    ~:OD S~?CT ~J

    Time Date Supervisor Assessing Discipline- id P. Leahy

    maintenance Engineering Supe sor

    Time Date Charged E yee-W. Marusiak

    Time Date Union epresentative

    Time Date -ness


    cc: V. Stoner C

    R. C. Schuster

    W. K. Tupper

    C. Washington

    C. Cary

    P. Connor

    J, Barton

    CC-BMWE - Wimmer

    LC-BMWE- Kmiec