i
0 SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 122
 P
 Y THE PITTSBURGH AND LAKE ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY
 THE LAID) ERIE AND EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY
 vs
 BROTHERHOOD OF RAIL1IAY AND STEAPISHIP CLERKS,
 FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES
 Award No. 2
 Case No. 3
 STATEMENT OF CLAIM
Claim of General Clerk Ralph Coe in the Superintendent Freight Transportation office at Pittsburgh, for an additional dayqs pay at the straight time rate of Chief Trace Clerk, account workin- that position on March 17, 1952, bein.required to suspend work on his own assignment, in violation of Rule 30 of the Clerks' Agreement. (CL-122)

 FINDINGS: The Board, upon the whole record and all the .evidence, finds that:

 The Carrier or Carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.

 The Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein. The parties to said dispute were Ziven due notice of hearing thereon.

 It has been satisfactorily demonstrated that Claimant?s position of General Clerk was not blanked on the date in question, but on the contrary, the duties of the vacationing Relief Chief Trace Clerk were distributed among the claimant and other office employes pursuant to Rule 33 and ~oNote·t contained therein.

 Uhat was said in Award No. 1, Case No. 2, SBA No. 122, relative to the applicability of Rule 43, is equally pertinent here.

 AUARD: Claim denied.

/s/ Harold M. Gilden
 Harold M. Gilden, Neutral and Only
 Member Thereof.
 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
 April 25, 1957