C Award No. 23
Case No. 35
P SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 122
Y
THE PITTSBURGH AND LAKE MIE RAILROAD C014PANY
TI-E LAKE, ERIE AND EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY
vs
BROTHERHOOD OF RAIWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS;
FREIGHT HANDLERS, &'MESS AND STATION EMPLOYEES
STATEMENT OF CLAUI:
Claim for a day?s pay for December 23, 1954 and subsequent dates, in
behalf of employes laid off without the required 43-hours advance notice provided
in Rule 14(a) of the Clerks? Agreement. (CL-273)
FINDINGS: The Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The Carrier or Carriers and the employee or employees involved in this
dispute are respectively 3arrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.
The Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein. The
parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
In that th, six men used to supplement the Platform Force at the
Pittsburgh Freight Station during the period Decsmber 17 to December 23, 1954,
were called frcm the e;cLx-a list for extra work and not to fill regularly assigned
jobs, the provisions of Rule 14(a) did not apply upon the termination of the work
opportunity.
AWARD: Claim denied.
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 122
sl Harold Ii. Giiden
Harold M. Gilden, Neutral and Only
Member Thereof
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
May 2$, 1957.