C SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUST~1NT 110. 122
0
P THE PITTSBURGH ~ AND LAIC MIE RAILROAD COMPANY Award !To. 25
Y THE LAKE ERIE. AND ZASTERII RAILROAD COMPANY Case No. 30
vs
BROTHERHOOD OF RA='!AY AP,1D STBAtxtSHIP CLrtMnKS,
FREIGHT HANDLiMSx 3~rPRRVSS AND STATION EMPLOYES



FITDIn]GS: The Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The Carrier or Carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.

The Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein. The parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.

Notwithstanding the General Yardmaster?s notice of disallowance of claim was issued after the Assistant Superintendent already had rejected same, the defect did not prejudice claimants rights to appeal his cause of action to the Director of Personnel pursuant to the terms of Agreement dated March 15, 1956..

Since it reasonably may be concluded from the evidence that less than three hours of clerical work remained to be performed at New Castle Junction Yard following the abolishment on December 319 1954, of stenographer-clerk Job 2 at that location, Section 2 of Letter Agreement of February 8, 1952, expressly authorizes the delegating of said remaining duties to the Yardmaster.

Section 3 of said Agreement sets forth joint check procedures for resolving differences of opinion as to ewtent of clerical work incidental to a given District No. 27 position.

On a failure to take advantage of the joint check arrangement referred to in said Section 3, there is no room to argue that more than three hours of clerical work still remained.

Claim denied.





Harold 11. Gilden, Neutral and Only Member Thereof. Pittsburgh, Pa. April 24, 1958.