c
0 SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 122
P
Y THE PITTSBURGH AND LAKE ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY
THE LAID; ERIE AND EASTERN RAILROAD C014PANY
vs
BROTHERHOOD OF RAIhI'TAY AND STEAMSHIP CLMS.
FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AIM STATION EMPLOYES
AWARD N0. 9
CASE NO. 14
STAT3,MNT OF CLAIM:
Claim for wage loss May 31 and June 1, 1954 account discipline assessed
against Engine Dispatcher D. R. I1itt at HaKees Rocks for alleged violation of
Rule 725 of the operating book of rules on May 26, 1954. (CL-225)
FINDINGS: The Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The Carrier or Carriers and the employee or employees involved in this
dispute are respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.
The Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein. The parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
A careful reading of the transcript of investigation fails to suggest
that Claimant was other than genuinely ill when he reported such condition to the
Crew Caller and advised him to obtain a substitute. There is no basis for presumir,; that Claimant would have been denied permission to lay off had he spoken
directly with Road Foreman of Engines. If the Carrier was intent on verifying
the authenticity of Claimants sickness, it had plenty of opportunity to do so.
A violation of Operating Rule 725 is not shown.
AZTARD; Claim sustained for earnings that would have accrued to Claimant had he
worked 8 hours on each of the days,
:lay
31, and June 1, 1954.
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTPENC' N0. 122
/s/ Harold H. Gilden
Harold M. Gilden, Neutral and Only
Member thereof.
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
April 25, 1957.