Parties: THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS
 THE BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY


STATEMENT 1. Carrier violated the agreement between
 OF CLAIM: the parties hereto when, on April 15, 1953,
 it caused, required and permitted train
 service employees not covered by the
 Telegraphers' Agreement to handle (receive,
 copy and deliver) train order No. 418 to
 Eng. 4327, Eng. 4838 assisting at Halltown
 via Millville.
 2. Carrier be required to permit a joint check
 of its records to determine the number of
 violations occurring subsequent to the
 foregoing date.
 3. Carrier be required to compensate the senior
 idle telegrapher (extra in preference) on
 the date shown above, and on all subsequent
 dates on which a joint check of records shows
 agreement to have been violated.
FINDINGS: On a trip from Winchester to Brunswick, at Winchester an operator issued a train order to a two engine train crew to run extra to Halltown an intermediate point. At Halltown the conductor copied another 'train order to proceed to Harper's Ferry, another intermediate point. There is no telegraph office at Halltown. There is a passing siding at that location. This is the only instance shown of the copying of a train order at Halltown.
The facts here are analagous to those involved in Dockets 1 and 19. For the reasons stated in our Findings in thos=Dockets we find no basis for a sustaining Award here.


Claims (1), (2), (3) Denied.
DOCKET NO. 4



S/ B. N. Kinkead S/ T. S. Woods
 B. N. Kinkead, Carrier Member
 Employe Member (Dissenting)
 Dated at Baltimore, Maryland this 23rd day of
 April, 1957.