C Award No. 28
0 Docket No. 28
P
Y SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 166

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,

FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES

versus

MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:






















FINDINGS: The confronting claims concern request of six named claimants for one
day?s pay account failure of respondent to properly allocate authorized
overtime on the enumerated %nassigned days.'?

The confronting disputes arise out of the consolidation of certain Carrier properties and the transfer of certain work and employes from Texas to St. Louis, Missouri.

To achieve the end sought, the*parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement bearing date of March 23, 1956, such Agreement containing a paragraph designated as Article V. It is the opinion of the Board that Article V of the Agreement was promulgated for the purpose of eliminating monetary claims or reparations-arising therefrom account of discontinuance, merger, consolidation, or transfer, in connection with, or by reason of the consolidation of departments occasioned by this reorganization.



It is the opinion of the Hoard, and it so finds, that on the basis of the facts in this particular case, it is reasonable to conclude that the work performed by those employes transferred from Texas did not become subject to the first sentence of Article V of the aforesaid Memorandum of Agreement bearing date of March 23, 1956. For the reasons stated, these claims are meritorious.

AITARD: Claims sustained.

                SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO, 166


                s Uvingston Smith

                Livingston Smith - Chairman


Is/ Ira F. Thomas /s/ G. W. Johnson
I. F. Thomas - Employe Member G. HJ. Johnson - Carrier Member

St. Louis, Missouri
September 20, 1957

- 2 -
C q1 It
Interpretation of Award No. 28
0 Docket No. 28
P
Y
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 166

            BROTHERHOOD OF RAID=JAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,

            FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES


Pursuant to the jointly executed request by the duly authorized representatives of the parties hereto, the Chairman of the Board enters the following interpretation of Award No. 28.

The parties have expressed uncertainty as to the intent of the Board when it entered its Award to the extent of i~claims sustained0

It is apparent that this request for interpretation is occasioned by the fact that the Award did not specifically specify as to whether or not the claims sustained were to be paid at the pro rata or punitive rate. We are fully cognizant of, and herewith reiterate, our adherence to that line of awards of the Third Division of the National Railroad Adjustment Board, wherein it has been held that the proper penalty rate for time not worked is the pro rata rate. No work was performed here, so, therefore, the proper rate to be paid in this particular instance is the pro rata rate.

                            SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 166


                            Ls( Livingston Smith

                            Livingston Smith - Chairman


I dissent:

IsLIra F. Thomas /s/ G. W. Johnson
I. F. Thomas - Employee Member G. 1'd. Johnson - Carrier Member

January 3, 1958