BROTHERHOOD OF RAIIIJAY AND STELAP1SHIP CLERKS.

FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AID STATION EMPLOYES

versus

MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COIiPANY


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes on the Missouri Pacific Railroad, that the Carrier violated the Clerks? Agreement:


















CLAIM STATEIIL'ENT

as

REVISED AND A1,MNDED


Claims of Yard Clerk I-T. D. Stukesbarv

Date Amount of Time Punitive Hourly Rate Amount
April 12, 1955 - 1 call 2 hours 52.58 ,v5'~ .16
April 7,3, 1955 - 1 call 2 hours 2.58 5.16
April 14, 1955 - 1 call 2 hours 2.58 5.16
April 15, 1955 - 1 call 2 hours 2.58 5.16
April 18, 1955 - 1 call 2 hours 2.58 5.16
April 19, 1955 - 1 call 2 hours 2.58 5.16
April 20, 1955 - 1 call 2 hours 2.58 5.16
April 21, 1955 - 1 call 2 hours 2.58 5.16
April 22, 1955 - 1 call 2 hours 2.58 5.16
I.




      Date Amount of Time Punitive Hourly rate Amount

      April 23, 1955 - 1 call 2 hours ;2.58 w5.16

      April 24; 1955 - 1 call 2 hours 2.58 5.16

      April 25, 1955 - 1 call 2 hours 2.58 5.16

      April 26, 1955 - 1 call 2 hours 2.58 5.16

      April 27, 1955 - 1 call 2 hours 2.58 5.16

      X372.24


      Subsequent claims of record are held in abeyance, per provisions of Article V, Paragraph 1 (b) of the Chicago Agreement of August 21, 1954, until the expiration of sixty days beyond the determination of the claims herein stipulated in this submission.


      FINDINGS : It appears that for convenience of crew members assigned to train

      #78 operating out of Fort Scott, Kansas, who live at Nevada,

      Missouri, the Carrier arranged to have them called at Nevada by a clerk on

      duty there for several years. On February 11, 1955, notices were given

      rearranging clerical positions at Nevada so that no clerk would be on duty

      on Sunday morning at the time train t78 usually departs. Accordingly,

      notice was given that crew members living in Nevada would have to make

      different arrangements to be called.


      Arrangements were then made for the Operator at Fort Scott to call a member of the crew at Nevada and let him advise the others.


      Since the basic calling requirement for this crew is at Fort Scott, and since the prior calling by a clerk at Nevada was a mere utilization of Carrier9s existing facilities for the convenience of that crew, there is no violation of the Clerks' Agreement by returning the calling requirement to Fort Scott.


Claim denied.

      SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 166


      /s/ Dudley E. Whiting

      Dudley E. Whiting - Chairman


/s/ Ira F. Thomas _ /s/ G. W. Johnson
I. F. Thomas - Employe Member G. 1'd. Johnson - Carrier Member

St. Louis, Missouri January 17, 1957