A
r
C 0 SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTIMNT N0. 167
P AWARD N0. 1
Y
Organization's File Carrier's File
102-A-11 CL-33-53
"Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
that:
,9(1) The Clerks? Agreement was violated during the
period April 21 to play 23, 1953, inclusive, as
result of Accent D. K. Downey being required or per
mitted to perform billing work when the position of
Bill Clerk at Helper Station was abolished.
1t(2) Cashier G. W. Truscott shall be paid three
hours at time and one-half rate of his assigned
position for each day - April 21, 22, 23, 24, 27,
28, 29, 30, May 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23, 1953, account not being
used to perform this work of billing coal shipments
on overtime basis when this work was handled by
Agent D. K. Downey.,'
FINDINGS: Immediately prior to April 20, 1953, the forces in the agents
office at Helper, Utah consisted of an agent and three telegraphers and the
chief clerk, cashier, bill clerk and janitor. On that date the position
of bill clerk was abolished due to decrease of business and part of the remaining work of the position was assigned to the agent and telegraphers,
who were not within the scope of the Clerks? Agreement. Claim is here made
in behalf of the cashier because he was not used to perform this work.
Both the Scope Rule and bulletin assignments are general in terms.
The A;ent?s position at Helper, Utah, is not an official position; he is
a working agent under the telegraphers? agreement.
The position of Bill Clerk at Helper, Utah, had previously been
abolished on numerous occasions when the coal mines were shut down or in
limited production and reestablished when the production increased so to
Award No. 1
require. During such time Carrier asserts that in the past the work had been
assigned to the Agent or Telegraphers. While this is disputed by the Employes,
the letter by the General Chairman dated April 5, 1938 complained of its
being done at that time and supports Carrier's statement.
Since that time several agreements have been negotiated between
the parties without change being made or sought in the applicable rule.
In March, 1953, two months before the filing of this claim, when
a similar situation existed, the employes filed a claim based solely on
the fact that the Agent was performing the billing work on an overtime basis.
That claim was promptly paid by Carrier with agreement Rthat the Agent at
Helper, Utah, will not be permitted to perform overtime work in the performance of duties regularly assigned to clerical position, i
In the light of the situation, we think the specific agreement
that the Agent should not be permitted to perform such clerical work overtime implies agreement that he may perform such work to fill out his regular
assignment in accord with the usual rule.
AWARD: Claim denied.
Is/
Mortimer Stone
Mortimer-Stone
Chairman, Neutral Member
/s/ D.
L.
Clavel
D.
L.
Clavel
Carrier Member
Vim. J. Donlon
Organization Member