AWARD NO, 1
NRAB DOCKET N0. CL-7776
° CASE N0. 1
° SSW FILE R-51-zoo-E-51
Y
P BRC FILE IE-27-32
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 169
PARTIES ~ The Brotherhood o£ Railway and Steamship Clerks
TO
DISPUTE) St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood:
(1) That Carrier violated the Clerks' current Agreement when it used an
employee junior to relief clerk P, N. Ryan, Pine Bluff, Arkansas, in the filling
of a temporary vacancy.
(2) That Relief Clerk P. N. Ryan be reimbursed at penalty rate of pay for
nine hours and ten minutes at Check Clerk rate of pay for Friday, May 18, 1951,
and for all subsequent dates until the violation is corrected.
FINDINGS: Claimant Ryan was regularly assigned to a Group 1 position and on one of
his rest days there was a temporary vacancy in Group 1 in the same
seniority district. One Murdock, who held no Group 1 seniority but who was regu
larly assigned to a Group 3 position, was used to fill the temporary vacancy in
Group 1.
Claim is made that Ryan was available and ready for service on this
extra work and should have bean used even though-it called for paying him time and
one-half for that work, while Murdock concededly, i£ properly used under the
agreement, could be used without the penalty rata of pay.
The agreement provides a fairly simple and unambiguous way for filling
temporary vacancies. Rule 11-1(a) provides as follows:
eeFurloughed or extra employees shall be used to fill a new position or
temporary vacancy for which they are qualified and available, in accordance with their seniority, A furloughed or extra employee cannot
claim extra work in excess of 40 hours in his work week if another such
employee who has had less than 40 hours in his work week is available,
except that if filling the assignment of a regular employee he may
continue thereon taking the work week of the assignment he is filling.
When a furloughed or extra employee takes the assignment of a regular
employee, he assumes the conditions of such assignment, including the
work week and rest days thereof.'P
Y
Award No. 1
Admittedly there were no furloughed or extra employees with Group 1 seniority
who
could be used to fill. the position for which this claim is made. Rule 11-1(b)
provides as follows:
e?An employee holding Group 1 seniority and regularly assigned to a
Group 2 or Group 3 position shall be used on a new position or
temporary vacancy in Group 1, for which he is qualified, and makes
application, provided no senior qualified furloughed or extra
employee is available.oi
As stated above, there was no qualified furloughed or extra employee available
and there was no employee holding Group 1 seniority regularly assigned to a
Group 2 or Group 3 position.
A note to Rule 3 reads as follows:
·?NOTE: The fact that seniority of employees does not begin until
assi3ned by bulletin will not prevent use of employees who have not
established seniority to perform extra work."
That note clearly permits Carrier to use an employee who has not established
seniority in Group 1 to perform extra work in Group 1. Much contention has been
made that the note does not apply to regularly assigned employees in Group 2 or
Group 3
who
have not established seniority in Group 1. The Board is unable to
find any distinction being made between assigned and
unassigned employees
in
Group 2 or Group 3 being used to fill a temporary vacancy in Group 1. The Board
is of the opinion that within the agreement Carrier has not restricted itself
in the use of Group 2 and Group 3 seniority men in performing extra work. It
therefore follows that the Carrier was not restricted in using a Group 2 or
Group 3 regularly assigned employee to fill a temporary vacancy on the Group 1
temporary vacancy that existed here.
AWARD: It is, therefore, the Award of the Board that the claim be and is hereby
denied.
/s/ Frank P.-Doualass
Frank P. Douglass, Chairman
/sl W. E. Straubinaer /s/ L. C. Albert.
W. E. Straubinger, Employee Member L. C. Albert, Carrier Member
Tyler, Texas,
March 5, 1957.