Award No. 46

Docket No. CL-9003


SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 170

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND, STEAMSHIP CLERKS*

FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND, STATION EMPLOYES

versus

ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that - -

(a) Carrier violated the rules of the Clerks, Agreement at Memphis, Tennessee, when on November 1, 1955, without negotiation or agreement it cancelled the long-established practice of furnishing to its employes working at Johnston Yard, free transportation from South Yard to the locations of theircemployment at Johnston Yard.

(b) That the long-established practice of furnishing free transportation to its employes from South Yard to Johnston Yard be restored.

(c) That employes named herein be compensated for expenses incurred in securing transportation in substitution for free transportation formerly provided by the Carrier.

H. S. Mills
W. E. Foster
W. B. McClintock
F. L. Younger
J. A. Ward
E. E. Ives
E. M. Carr
G. C. Jones
J. B. Nichel
W. L. Doyle
T. E. Fauver
W. S. Deaton
J. D. Rodgers
W. A. Owen
R. T. Strange
J. B. Mills
A. L. Brown
C. E. McKnight
W. L. Sawner
D. E. Post
V. L. Agy
E. Y. Tucker
L. L. Steward
J. W. Oswalt
J.C.Chidester,Jr.
J. W. O'Linger .

L. M. Janes
I. E. Abbott
N. G. Nuckolls
R. F. Taylor
H. B: Abernathy
0. E. Pirtle
T. B. Trotter
H. D. Hammond
R. Hill
E. W. Rose
D. L. Mann
J. P. Park
V. T. Crook
A. S. Caylor
J. E. Trusler
L. M. Malone
I. L. Richards
W. E. Merritt
J. Evensky
R. C. Childress
R. L. Turner
E. M. Groseclose
J. T. Evans
W. K. Rowe
D. S. Trainer
J. M. Hobbs

W. A. Sloan
N. S. Dahl
C. W. Spear
N. R. Whitaker
C. J. Reneau
G. A. Lohnes
A. A. Ashworth
R. E. Sanders, Jr.
L. I. Todd
A. Friedman
J. F. Archer
John Horton
K. Mabry
Humphrey Thomas,Jr.
Hill Wilson, Jr.
L. Blaylock
U. Green
Robert Berkley
L. Anderson
L. C. Reed
Joe Smith
P. J. Watson
J. D. Taylor
S. A. Cole
Luther Laekland
R. C. McCormick

F. C. Hayden
J. F. Kenney, Jr.
14. T. Power
E. W. Miller
B. J. Edwards
T. H. Emerson, Jr.
A. M. Dunlap
I. B. Hall
C. T. Tharpe
C. E. Birman
K. L. Parks
FI. Gaines
R. L. Curry
H. Thomas
A Scruggs
J. Perkins
J. Tables
W. Steger
W. Lee
M. Sims
C. Wallace
M. Davis
J. L. Guest
B. Jones
C. W. Wilson
W. W. Wood



E. C. Maupin R. D. Moore C. H. Stroh E. Beteet
W. A. Murphy C. L. Perry W. R. Maggert A. Butcher
C. W. Milton K. E. Nolan P. C. Lamb B. Dean
L. H. Bruch H. J. Richardson W. J. Halloway J. W. Posey
V. S. Larkin W. C. Epperson W. L. Johnson C. H. Woodard
J. A. Taylor J. T. Hutton J. M. Berry, Jr. G. Benford
B. M. Johnson A. R. Keenum J. W. Surprise P. L. Gurley
A. G. Maelin C. H. Hutchison E. G. Hillhouse H. Harris
J. E. Parker L. W. Lawrence C. N. Brewer A. M. Wright
B. H. Hildreth C. M. Murdaugh S. I. Teas F. R. Eubanks
G. D. Brown H. W. Rousseaux 0. L. Head C. L. Early, Jr.
E. Rawes C. B. Clark C. W. Chism W. V. Rutherford
f. H. Groseclose L. N. Dye F. W. Wood J. T. McGee, Sr.
M. C. Hines B. R. Ary R. N. Ingram R. T. Dandridge
0. L. Schmitz B. S. Taylor L. M. Addington C. L. Clark
M. 0. Hart John Gillen 8. T. Passene I. Baskin
M. W. Abbott James Britton A. M. Wright 0. Hunter
E. M. Pegues Charlie Wright F. R. Eubanks W. W. Trout
D. R. Wade C. F. Hartness,Jr. W. B. Rutherford E. Peck, Jr.
B. J. Walters Herman Maddox W. G. Stoddard G. Logwood
M. L. Sanford Robert Mitchell N. E. Terrell N. E. Terrell
B. M. Manuel Berry W. Martin W. W. Wood S. V. Catanzaro
J. A. Ganong, Jr. F. Campbell L. R. Bryan L. E. May
R. M. Hardy Nathaniel Jones S. V. Catanzaro C. Brown
C. 0. Gross Alfonso Biles D. D. McGee W. McGill
M. P. Murdaugh Will Williams J. H. Boswell U. Eason, Jr.
V. M. Clark L. Stevenson J. Sturgist L. Banks
H. L. Rogers E. Mitchell S. J. Blanton W. C. Stoddard
H. F. Holmes Cleveland H. Cox J. Thomas H. Milan
W. T. Carter George Scott F. Douglas 0. Sims
R. N. Person J. Douglas $. Riley P. Sipland
E. L. Crockett Louis Williams 0. M. Estes M. W. Mason
C. R. Ferguson Brooks Hale F. Hunter L. L. Gregg
J. H. Warren Alver McClara B. Ollie W. J. Pratt
R. E. Lee Lex Polk G. Campbell E. B. Hodge
W. R. Milam Eddie Green M. Hallman H. P. Johnson
L. R. King Douglas Young S. Russell J. Darling
A. Thomas J. H. Reeves C. W. Doyle E. E. Harding
Rennie Sanders J. H. Barnes R. A. Pittsinger W. J. B. Cooper
G. Molden J. W. Goodman H. S. Lowe G. T. Gibson
J. Canada B. B. Wheeler J. W. McLean J. A. Ford
Frank Maggitt B. A. Turner H. R. Grimmer C. H. Edney
W. H. Harrison V. D. Harris Pauline Snell J. R. Mayer
L. A. Young J. B. Herriman M. J. Betancourt W. S. Nailling
J. Murray H. F. Collins P. A. McHugh Robert Hollins

      NOTE: Reparation to be determined by joint cheek of expenses incurred by each Claimant.


                            _ 2

                              _

                                          Award No. 46

                                          Docket No. CL-9003


OPINION. Prior to 1904 l.arrierfs terminal facilities were located at South Yard,
Memphis. Upon sompletion of its newly constructed terminal facilities at Johnston Yard, the majority of Carriers yard operating personnel were moved to Johnston Yard. A train was placed in operation to transplant the employes to their new work location.

This service continued until July 8, 1932, when it was discontinued and again resumed on July 17, 1932. When the service was discontinued in 1932, a protest was entered, and on July 16, 1932, Carriers Vice President conceded that a letter written May 22, 1914, by the General Manager to employe representatives of the train and engine service organizations was an agreement. The Carrier restored the service the following day. It also appears that the Carrier in 1955 renewed its efforts to substitute bus service for train service; however, no agreement was consummated to this effect. The Carrier discontinued operation of train service November 1, 1955.

It is the position of the Carrier that the Employes have failed to comply with the provisions of Article V of the August 21, 1954, Agreement, when, in presenting and handling this case on the property, they failed to name the specific claimants involved. Carrier relies upon Award No. 40, Special Board of Adjustment No. 170. There are other awards in harmony with the above award, but all such awards relate to remuneration for service performed. In the case at bar the claim is not for a money award but is in the nature of a mandamus for the continuation of a long established service. We do not think that Article V, above cited, is controlling in the case at bar.

It is the position of the Employes that where an agreement is negotiated or revised and existing practices are not abrogated or changed by its terms, such practices are enforceable to the same extent as the provisions of the agreement. Employes cite many awards in support of tUs claim including Award 2436 where it was held.

    "Where a contract is negotiated and existing practices are not abrogated or changed by its terms, such practices are enforcible to the same extent as the provisions of the contract itself."


It is the position of the Carrier that free transportation may be granted or discontinued at the option of the Carrier. We note that the parties did not negotiate any rule into the agreement relating to free transportation of employes to and from their work location at Johnston Yard at the time the agreement was first negotiated or at any subsequent revisions. We also note that free transportation has been given to employes, with two exceptions, for approximately 50 years and was first granted as an inducement to employes to follow their work when their positions were removed from South Yard to Johnston Yard.

We note that there was no contract or agreement between the Carrier and the Clerks for the furnishing of train service to its employes. The services rendered were a gratuity and, as such, could be withdrawn at the option of the

                            -3 -

                                          Award No. 46

                                          Docket No. CL-8003


Carrier. There was no violation of any rule, and hence no rule to interpret by this Board.

BINDINGS: The Special Board of Adjustment No. 170, after giving to the parties
to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:

That the Carrier and Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act;

That the Special Board of Adjustment No. 170 has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That the agreement was not violated.


AWARD: Claim denied.

                SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 170


                    //

                  Wward 1KI. shalve

                  Edward M. Sharpe - Chairman


R. W. Copeland - Carrier Member $. R. Rallmann - Mploye 1Rember

Chicago, Illinois

    IT,

    Date