SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 171
HhOTHE~.LHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAhSHIP CLERKS,
FREIGHT HANDLE:S, EIPRFSS AND STATION EMPLOYEES
GREAT NORTBEnN RAILWAY CGhPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks,
Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes that the Carrier violated the
current agreement,
1. When on May 6,, 1956 the Carrier suspended one Walter J. Thompson for
a period of fifteen days for alleged responsibility in connection with having
submitted excessive automobile mileage on Expense Form 255 for the month of
Marcho 1956.
2. That the Carrier now be required to compensate said Walter J. Thompson,
Assistant Chief Clerk,, Yard Office, Great Fallso Montana in full for the
fifteen days that he was suspended illegally.
FINDINGS
: This Special Board of Adjustment upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds that:
The claimant received a notice from the Carrier dated April 3, 1956 stating
that the claimant was notified to report to the Trainmaster's Office Great
Falls, Montana, at 2:00 p.m., Thursday, April 5, 1956, for formal investigation
to develop facts and place responsibility relative to claimants apparent
falsification of his automobile expense account for the month of March, 1956.
On the same date the Carrier wrote claimant "Investigation postponed
until 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, April 18, 1956, at Trainmaster's Office, Great
Falls, Montana."
Claimant states that the Carrier violated Mule 56(a) in that it slid not
hold an investigation within seven (7) days of the date when the claimant was
charged with an offense.
The Carrier states that under Rule 56(a) it had the right to a reasonable
postponement of this hearing when it was unable to secure the presence of
witnesses who were not immediately available,
The Board finds from a careful reading of Rule 56(a) that the investigation
must be held within seven (7) days of the date when an employee is charged
with an offense or held :from service. Also, that when it becomes necessary
to secure the presence of witnesses or representatives not immediately available,, a reasonable postponement may be had at the request of either the
Carrier or employee.
AUARD 1\10. 27
CASE N0. 27
The Carriers letter dated April
3,
1956, setting the date of the hearing
as of April 5, 1956 at 2:00 p.m., conformed with -tine 56(a) as the hearing
was scheduled within seven (7) days of the notice of April
3,
1956. However,
the Carriers second letter on April
3,
1956 stated
"my
Q-359 date, investigation
postponed until 2:00 p.m., i·!ednesday, April 18, 1956, at Trainmaster's Office,
Great Falls, Montana." This letter is not a request for a reasonable postponement, but is a statement that the hearing will be heard on the 18th of
April, 1956 rather than the 5th of April, 1956. April 18, 1956, being more
than seven (7) days from April 3, 1956, the date the employee was charged
with an offense, the Carrier violated Rule 56(a) of the Effective Agreement.
Therefore, this claim must be sustained.
A W A R D
Claim sustained,
/s/ Thomas C. Begley
Thomas C, Begley, Chairman
/s/ C. A. Pear son
C. A. Pearson, Carrier Member
Is/
C. C. Dencwith
C, C. Denewith, Employee Member
Signed at St. Paul, Minnesota this 10th day of December, 1958.
-2