SPECIAL HOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO.
171
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,
FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION ENIPLOYE
GREAT NORTHF.B.N RAILWAY COMPANY
STATENENT OF GLUM:
f,: E.hD NO.
53
CASE
N0. 53
EGei V,
i Jj L 2
it
tj L 2
8ER
J UL 20 1t )5q
Claim of the System Committee of the Motherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks,
Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes that the Carrier violated the current
agreement
1. a&en on November
24, 25
and December
2, 1957
they improperly compensated employes for services performed while on vacation, and
2,
That the Carrier now be required to compensate each of the following
named employes for the dates under which name, one days pay each at two and
one-half times the daily rate of their positions less straight time allowed for
services performed.
November
24, 1957
Matt Tykkila
Alexander Grymala
Paul Topak
Antonius Lunde
November
25. 1957
Matt Tykkila
Alexander Grymala
Paul Topak
Decemb~er
2 _1957
Frank a81mi
Torger Rolson
Arthur Ranta
William Aho
Arne Koskinen
John 9oyring
Peter Larson
S, Davidoski
John Keiser
Walfred Hill
Eli Pellman
3.
That the Carrier also be required to compensate the following employes
at the pro rata rate of ore handler positions, one days pay each for the following
dates under which their names appear:
November
24., 1957
Patrick Ozaer
Herman Norman
Ernest Ahola
Edward Salo
November
25, 1957
Patrick Ozaer
Herman Morman
Ernest Ahola
December
2, 1957
Patrick Oz®er
Herman Morman
Ernest Ahola
Edward Salo
Edward Mikkola
Martin Bitner
Richard Raunio
Donald Amt's
Edward Maki
Elmer Koski
Leroy Falk
AWARD NO
. 53
CASE NO.
53
FINDINGS
:
The employees state that the Carrier improperly compensated employees
for service performed at the Allouez Ore Docks on November 24, 25 and December 2$
1957, as these employees were on their vacations when called to work by the
Carrier due to some delayed boats arriving at Allouez after the close of the ore
season.
The Carrier states that due to the seasonal nature of the operation at the
Allouez Ore Docks and the corresponding fluctuations in business and in the force
necessary to handle the business, the handling of vacations is treated somewhat
differently at Allouez than elsewhere over the system of this Carrier, Ore handlers
frequently request, and are granted, permission to split their vacations. Also, ore
handlers ask to receive vacation payments when laid off due to a reduction in force.
In such instaneesj the vacation of the ore handler terminates when he is again able
to work and he receives the balance of his vacation at a later date. That many ore
handlersp particularly those with high seniority standing, ask to take their vacations
immediately upon the close of the ore season. That prior to November 20, 1957, it
appeared to the Carrier that the ore season would close on November 24th and
appropriate force reduction was made which included laying off some of these
claimants on November 20th and some of the claimants that were laid off had asked
to be placed on vacation at the end of the ore season,
On November 23rd the Carrier received information that the Steamer Humphrey
would make one more trip and would be at Allouez Ore Docks on November 26th.
That although these claimants were laid off and advised that the ore season was over
it happened that the ore season was not in fact over and there was additional work
to be performed and with the arrival of the Steamer Humphrey, it was necessary to
increase the force on November 24, and 25 and all of these claimants had sufficient
seniority to be entitled to the work.
The Carrier decided to allow each of the claimants who had requested that
their vacation begin at the end of the ore season to make his own decision whether
or not he would return to work on November 24 and November 25. They could either
remain on vacation and lose the work, or split their vacation and perform the service necessary and then have the vacation extended by the number of days they
worked. The Steamer Humphrey again arrived at Allouez on December 2nd and the
Carrier was faced w ith the same situation which had confronted it on November 24
and 25.
The Arbitrator finds from the submissions and arguments advanced by the
parties that it has been the practice at Allouez for the employees, if they wished.,
to take their vacations at the end of the ore season and if work would come in after
the Carrier and the employees thought that the ore season had been finished the
Carrier would then ask the employee if he cared to work for the number of days
necessary and split his vacation; that the claimants were not forced to come back
to work by the Carrier, but only to return to service if they so desir.d at the
straight time rate; that most of the employees came back to work, but that some
of the employees desired not to work and to continue on their vacation; that if
the men came back to work they were carried on the payroll at straight times although
the days previous to corning back to work they might have been carried on the payroll as on vacation and after they finished the additional. work necessary to be
performed the employes were then put back on vacation time until they received
all the days of the vacation due them.
-2-
AWARD N0.
53
CASE No.
53
Tho Arbitrator finds that this was the practice at Allouez and therefore
no umployoe was required to perform work on November 2Lt, 25, and December 2nd,
while on vacation, if he did not. wish to do so, but that the employees who did
work due to their soniority standing elected to split their vacations. Therefore,
this claim will be denied.
AWARD
Claim denied.
/s/ Thomas C. Begley
Thomas C, Bcgloy, Chairman
/s/ C, A. Pears on
C. A. Pearson, Carrier Member
/s/ C, C. Denewith
C, C, enewith, EmployeeFlember
Signed at St. Paul, Plinnesota this 10th day of Fobruary, 1959.